Ex parte Sellers
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
| Citation | 519 So.2d 1292 |
| Parties | Ex parte David SELLERS. (Re: David Leon Sellers, alias v. State). 86-1274. |
| Decision Date | 18 December 1987 |
Page 1292
(Re: David Leon Sellers, alias
v.
State).
Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1988.
Joel L. Sogol, of Sogol & Chandler, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Helen P. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
BEATTY, Justice.
On the authority of Borden v. State, [Ms. 7 Div. 691, October 13, 1987] (Ala.Crim.App.1987), and Mulhern v. State, 494 So.2d 787 (Ala.Crim.App.1986), the petitioner's conviction for trafficking in marijuana is reversed due to the insufficiency of the evidence, and judgment is hereby rendered for petitioner on that charge.
REVERSED AND JUDGMENT RENDERED.
TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Presley v. State
...1975, § 20-2-80, the State has the burden of proving that the defendant possessed in excess of 2.2 pounds of the drug. Ex parte Sellers, 519 So.2d 1292 (Ala.1987); see also Borden v. State, 523 So.2d 508 (Ala.Crim.App.1987); Mulhern v. State, 494 So.2d 787 ".... "The State asserts that it m......
-
Orange v. Bailey
... ... City of Leeds v. Town of Moody, 294 Ala. 496, 319 So.2d 242 (1975); cf. Ex parte Four Seasons, Ltd., 450 So.2d 110 (Ala.1984); Alford v. City of Gadsden, 349 So.2d 1132 (Ala.1977); Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Bd. of the City of ... ...
-
Higdon v. State, 8 Div. 932
... ... AFFIRMED ... All Judges concur ... --------------- ... 1 In Sellers v. State, 511 So.2d 278 (Ala.Cr.App.), rev'd and rendered, 519 So.2d 1292 (Ala.1987), our supreme court recently applied the principles expounded in ... ...
-
Ray v. State
...1975, § 20-2-80, the State has the burden of proving that the defendant possessed in excess of 2.2 pounds of the drug. Ex parte Sellers, 519 So.2d 1292 (Ala.1987); see also Borden v. State, 523 So.2d 508 (Ala.Crim.App.1987); Mulhern v. State, 494 So.2d 787 "For purposes of § 20-2-80, mariju......
Request a trial to view additional results