Ex parte Strawbridge

Decision Date20 December 1917
Docket Number6 Div. 660
Citation201 Ala. 62,77 So. 356
PartiesEx parte STRAWBRIDGE. v. STRAWBRIDGE. STATE
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Petition by Will Strawbridge for certiorari to review order of Court of Appeals (76 So. 479), reversing judgment for the State and remanding. Writ denied.

M.S. Carmichael, M.A. Owen, and Claude Riley, all of Elba, J.A. Carnley, of Enterprise, and C.C. Nesmith, of Birmingham, for appellant.

W.L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P.W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 573, is not subject to the constitutional objection urged against same in brief and application and as considered and discussed by the Court of Appeals, and thinks that the writ should be denied.

Whether or not the order or resolution of the commissioners of Lamar county, in fixing the punishment, was authorized by the act, or the act is self-acting in this respect, is a question which seems not to have been presented to the Court of Appeals, and was not considered or discussed. Indeed, the petition for the certiorari and the brief in support of same, conforming to rule 42 (175 Ala. xx), urges a review and revision only of the points decided and discussed in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. To grant the writ in this case for the reason suggested by some of the members of the court and reverse the Court of Appeals would be to do so upon a point never passed upon by said court and in direct violation of rule 42.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C.J., and McCLELLAN, SOMERVILLE, and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • American Book Co. v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1927
  • Hughes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1931
    ... ... 741). County Board quasi-corporation and may ... sue or be sued. County Board of Education v. Watts, ... 19 Ala. App. 7 (95 So. 498); [Ex parte Watts] 209 Ala. 115 ... (95 So. 502); Allred v. Dunn, 207 Ala. 469 (93 So ... 390); Wall-Hay-Wall Lbr. Co. v. Mathews ([211 Ala ... 426] 100 So ... ...
  • State v. Kirkpatrick
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • October 24, 1922
    ... ... B. Kirkpatrick. On hearing, petitioner was ... discharged, and the State appeals. Affirmed ... Certiorari ... denied, Ex parte State of Alabama, 95 So. 494 ... [95 So. 491] ... Harwell ... G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and C. R. Wiggins and A. F. Fite, both ... of ... p. 573; Posey v. State, 17 Ala. App. 448, 86 So ... 117; Hicks v. State, 16 Ala. App. 88, 75 So. 636; ... State v. Strawbridge, 16 Ala. App. 195, 76 So. 479, ... Id., 201, Ala. 62, 77 So. 356; Oliver v. State, 16 ... Ala. App. 533, 79 So. 313; Mills v. Conecuh County, ... ...
  • Hill v. Moody
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1922
    ...77 So. 963; State ex rel. v. Board of Rev., etc., 180 Ala. 489, 61 So. 368; Leonard v. Lyons, 204 Ala. 615, 87 So. 99; Ex parte Strawbridge, 201 Ala. 62, 77 So. 356; Id., Ala. App. 195, 76 So. 479; Mills v. Commissioners, etc., 204 Ala. 40, 85 So. 564. Was there an attempt at delegation of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT