Ex parte Tingley
| Decision Date | 19 May 1949 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 881. |
| Citation | Ex parte Tingley, 41 So.2d 276, 252 Ala. 525 (Ala. 1949) |
| Parties | Ex parte Harold TINGLEY. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 30, 1949.
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
H. L. Anderton, of Birmingham, for petitioner.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Wm. N. McQueen, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Harold Tingley for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Ex parte Tingley, Ala.Sup., 41 So.2d 273.
Writ denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Adams v. State, 6 Div. 902
...If for no other reason, the guilt or innocence of the accused was not a material inquiry in the instant proceedings. Tingley v. State, 252 Ala. 525, 41 So.2d 276. Without question the petitioners failed to establish sufficient proof to overcome the prima facie case made by the The judgment ......