Exton v. The Central Railroad Co.
| Decision Date | 19 June 1899 |
| Citation | Exton v. The Central Railroad Co., 46 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 356 (N.J. 1899) |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Parties | JOSEPH H. EXTON AND FANNY P. EXTON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR |
Error to supreme court.For opinion of supreme court, see62 N. J. Law, 7, 42 Atl. 486.
Paul A.Queen and H. Burdett Herr, for plaintiffs in error.
George H. Large, for defendant in error.
The judgment in this case is unanimously affirmed, upon the opinion in the supreme court.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Goldberg v. Housing Authority of City of Newark
... ... In Exton v. Central R.R. Co., 62 N.J.L. 7, 42 A. 486, 56 L.R.A. 508 (Sup.Ct.1898), affirmed o.b., 63 N.J.L. 356, 46 A. 1099, 56 L.R.A. 508 (E. & A. 1899), the railroad knew of prior scuffling between cabmen for business, but nonetheless did not eject or otherwise ... ...
-
Tormo v. Yormark, Civ. A. No. 298-73.
... ... 1944). Accord, In re Equitable Office Bldg. Corp., 83 F.Supp. 531, 562 (S.D.N.Y.1949); Central Cab Co. v. Clarke, 259 Md. 542, 270 A.2d 662, 666 (1970); In re Carr's Estate, 371 Pa. 520, 92 ... See, e. g., Exton v. Central R.R. Co., 62 N.J.L. 7, 42 A. 486 (Sup.Ct.1898), aff'd 63 N.J.L. 356, 46 A. 1099 (E. & ... ...
-
Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.
... ... See Exton v. Central R.R. Co., 62 N.J.L. 7, 11[42 A. 486] (Sup.Ct. 1898), aff'd. 63 N.J.L. 356 [46 A. 1099] ... ...
-
Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Strange
... ... 935; ... Freemont, etc., R. [171 Ind. 165] Co. v ... Hagblad (1904), 72 Neb. 773, 101 N.W. 1033, 106 N.W ... 1041, 4 L.R.A. (N.S.) 254; Exton v. Central R ... Co. (1899), 63 N.J.L. 356, ... [84 N.E. 822] ... 46 A. 1099, 56 L.R.A. 508; Warren v. Fitchburg ... R. Co. (1861), 8 Allen ... ...
Get Started for Free