Faber v. Hovey

Decision Date26 January 1875
Citation117 Mass. 107
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesEberhard Faber v. Samuel D. Hovey & another

Middlesex. Contract on a judgment of the Supreme Court of the County and State of New York. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and to this court on appeal, upon an agreed statement of facts in substance as follows:

A judgment was recovered in the State of New York, at the time and for the amount alleged, by the plaintiff against these defendants. An appeal was duly taken, under the laws of New York, from said judgment to the general term of the Supreme Court of that State, and the said appeal was there pending at the commencement of this action, and is still there pending. By the laws of New York, upon an appeal being taken from a judgment, such appeal does not stay the proceedings or the execution of the judgment, unless a written undertaking be executed, on the part of the appellant, by at least two sureties, to the effect that if the judgment appealed from or any part thereof, be affirmed, the appellant will pay such judgment and all costs and damages which shall be awarded against the appellant upon the appeal. In this case, no security was given by the defendants, or either of them, as is required by the laws of New York, to stay proceedings in the suit, or upon the judgment, upon such appeal being taken or to prevent the issuing of an execution upon the judgment and their property, and the property of either of them, in the State of New York, is liable to be taken upon an execution issued upon such judgment, in order to satisfy the same, their said appeal and its due prosecution and pendency to the contrary notwithstanding. And by the laws of the State of New York, upon reversal or modification by the appellate court of the judgment aforesaid, such court may make order for the restitution of money paid, or property and rights, if any, lost by reason of the judgment so reversed or modified.

If upon the above facts the plaintiff is entitled to judgment in this action, in this court, then judgment is to be entered for him according to his declaration, for the amount of said judgment, with interest thereon from the date of the rendition thereof to the date of judgment in this court, with costs; otherwise, for the defendants.

On the foregoing facts the Superior Court ordered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed to this court.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

P. Thacher, for the plaintiff.

B. F. Jacobs, for the defendants.

Gray, C. J. Ames & Endicott, JJ., absent.

OPINION

Gray, C. J.

The Constitution of the United States declares that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts records and judicial proceedings of every other state; and empowers Congress by general laws to prescribe the manner in which such acts,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Lowell Bar Ass'n v. Loeb
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 8, 1943
    ...Hersey, 303 Mass. 82 , 84. Nelson v. Bailey, 303 Mass. 522, 526. Dudley v. Sheehan Construction Co. 305 Mass. 144 , 146. See also Faber v. Hovey, 117 Mass. 107 . As soon as an appeal has been claimed, and before the final decree is vacated by entry of the appeal in this court, a statutory p......
  • Carilli v. Hersey
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1939
    ...G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 214, §§ 19, 26; Myers v. International Trust Co., 273 U.S. 380, 47 S.Ct. 372, 71 L.Ed. 692. See also Faber v. Hovey, 117 Mass. 107, 19 Am.Rep. 398;Cleveland v. Quilty, 128 Mass. 578;Burbank v. Farnham, 220 Mass. 514, 107 N.E. 351,108 N.E. 492;Martell v. Dorey, 235 Mass. 35......
  • Fehr v. McHugh
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • March 31, 1980
    ...391 F.Supp. 1053 (E.D.Tenn.1974) (same); Woodbridge & Turner Engineering Co. v. Ritter, 70 F. 677 (C.C.E.D.Pa.1895) (same); Faber v. Hovey, 117 Mass. 107 (1875) (same); Lonergan v. Lonergan, 55 Neb. 641, 76 N.W. 16 (1889) (same); Weiss v. Metalsalts Corp., 72 N.J. Super. 264, 178 A.2d 240 (......
  • Rodney v. Gibbs
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 16, 1904
    ... ... 160; Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N.Y. 386, 18 N.E ... 123; Burton v. Burton, 28 Ind. 342; Scheible v ... Slagle, 89 Ind. 323; Faber v. Hovey, 117 Mass ... 107; Young v. Brehi, 19 Nev. 379, 12 P. 564; ... Bank v. Calvit, 3 Smed. & Mar. 143 ...          In ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT