Fabrique v. Company
Decision Date | 07 July 1904 |
Docket Number | 13,764 |
Citation | 69 Kan. 733,77 P. 584 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | A. H. FABRIQUE et al. v. THE CHEROKEE & PITTSBURG COAL AND MINING COMPANY et al |
Decided July, 1904.
Error from Sedgwick district court; D. M. DALE, judge.
Judgment affirmed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
CONVEYANCE -- When a Deed is a Mortgage. A mortgage is a defeasible conveyance to secure the payment of a debt. Where there is no continuing debt, the execution of a deed with a simultaneous contract to reconvey upon the payment of certain sums of money by the grantor to the grantee within a specified time the payment of which is optional with the grantor, is a conditional sale and not a mortgage.
C. V Ferguson, for plaintiffs in error.
A. A. Hurd, and O. J. Wood, for defendants in error.
OPINION
This was an action to have a certain deed and contract declared to be a mortgage, to ascertain the amount due the defendant thereon, and to have the premises sold to satisfy the amount so found due in case it should not be paid within a time specified by the court. The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition, which was overruled. On the trial it objected to the introduction of any evidence under the petition. This objection was sustained and judgment rendered for defendant for costs. Plaintiff brings error.
The petition shows the following material facts: In 1892 L. G. Scheetz was the owner of lots 113 and 115 on Douglas avenue, in Griffenstein's addition to the city of Wichita. While such owner he undertook to construct thereon a three-story brick and stone building, according to the plans and specifications referred to in the agreement. After performing some portion of the work he became greatly involved for material and labor, and among his creditors was L. C. Jackson, to whom he executed a mortgage on this property for $ 4800. This mortgage was assigned to defendant and, at the time of the agreement hereinafter set out, had been foreclosed and the premises ordered sold. The property had also been deeded for taxes, the amount of which was about $ 1200. By reason of his indebtedness Scheetz was compelled to suspend the construction of this building.
On September 28, 1897, Scheetz executed a warranty deed of the property to defendant. On September 21, 1897, the parties entered into the following agreement:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shaner v. Rathdrum State Bank
... ... exist a debt which must be personal in its nature and ... enforceable against the person independent of the ... security." (Fabrique v. Cherokee & P. Coal & Mining ... Co., 69 Kan. 733, 77 P. 584; Rushton v ... McIllvene, 88 Ark. 299, 114 S.W. 709; Miller v ... Smith, 20 N.D ... ...
-
Thomas v. Ogden State Bank
... ... respective claims be paid as aforesaid," in September, ... 1923, caused the defendant Grouse Creek Land and Livestock ... Company to be incorporated and induced the plaintiff "to ... convey by deeds and conveyances absolute in form to the said ... defendant Grouse Creek Land ... 546, 46 So. 851; Snell ... v. White, 132 Ark. 349, 200 S.W. 1023; ... Holmberg v. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787, 108 So ... 211; Fabrique v. Cherokee, etc., Mining ... Co., 69 Kan. 733, 77 P. 584; Randall v ... Sanders, 87 N.Y. 578 ... We are ... not unmindful of the ... ...
-
Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. Torrey
... ... there is a debt which must inevitably be paid. Eckert v ... McBee, 27 Kan. 232; Fabrique v. Mining Co., 69 ... Kan. 733, 77 P. 584; Root v. Wear, 98 Kan. 234, 157 ... P. 1181; Hoyt v. National Bank, 115 Kan. 167, 222 P ... 127; ... ...
-
Worley v. Carter
...equity will hold it a mortgage, no matter whether the transaction is evidenced by one or two instruments." ¶12 In Fabrique v. Mining Company, 69 Kan. 733, 77 P. 584, it is said, quoting from Kent's Commentaries (14th Ed.) p. 163, note "d": "The test of the distinction is this: If the relati......