Facilities Cost Management Group v. Otoe County School District 66-0111

Docket NumberS-16-1193
Decision Date26 January 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • De Vries v. L & L Custom Builders, Inc.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 17, 2021
    ...N.W.2d 664 (2019).27 AVG Partners I v. Genesis Health Clubs , 307 Neb. 47, 948 N.W.2d 212 (2020).28 Facilities Cost Mgmt. Group v. Otoe Cty. Sch. Dist. , 298 Neb. 777, 906 N.W.2d 1 (2018).29 Brief of appellant at 28.30 Gard v. City of Omaha , 18 Neb. App. 504, 786 N.W.2d 688 (2010).31 See, ......
  • Lindsay Int'l Sales & Serv., LLC v. Wegener
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • September 7, 2018
    ...Id. An appellate court reviews a denial of a motion for new trial for an abuse of discretion. Facilities Cost Mgmt. Group v. Otoe Cty. Sch. Dist., 298 Neb. 777, 906 N.W.2d 1 (2018).ANALYSISImpairment of Collateral Affirmative Defense.In the section of their operative answer listing affirmat......
  • Summit Restoration, Inc. v. Keller
    • United States
    • Nebraska Court of Appeals
    • December 8, 2020
    ...motion for directed verdict, made at the conclusion of all the evidence, should have been sustained. Facilities Cost Mgmt. Group v. Otoe Cty. Sch. Dist. , 298 Neb. 777, 906 N.W.2d 1 (2018). To sustain a motion for JNOV, the court resolves the controversy as a matter of law and may do so onl......
  • Jacobs Eng'g Grp. Inc. v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • September 14, 2018
    ...Id.5 State v. Amaya , 298 Neb. 70, 902 N.W.2d 675 (2017). See, also, Armstrong , supra note 3.6 Facilities Cost Mgmt. Group v. Otoe Cty. Sch. Dist. , 298 Neb. 777, 906 N.W.2d 1 (2018). See, also, Armstrong , supra note 3.7 Cano v. Walker , 297 Neb. 580, 901 N.W.2d 251 (2017).8 Armstrong , s......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT