Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 71654
| Decision Date | 25 November 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 71654,71654 |
| Citation | 956 S.W.2d 425 |
| Parties | The FAITH BAPTIST CHURCH OF BERKELEY, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Oscar D. HEFFNER, Defendant/Appellant, and Oscar Heffner Real Estate Co., Defendant. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Oscar D. Heffner, St. Louis, pro se.
Thomas C. Boyle, Ellisville, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Defendant, Oscar Heffner, appeals from the trial court's judgment after a hearing granting a permanent injunction enjoining him from foreclosing on a 17 year old promissory note and deed of trust against property owned by plaintiff, Faith Baptist Church. Plaintiff asserted the documents were not genuine. Defendant argues that the trial judge was biased and that he was denied due process of law by not being afforded a jury trial which he never requested. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rules 81.12 and 84.04.
Defendant appeals pro se. Pro se appellants are bound by the same rules of procedure as are lawyers, and are not entitled to indulgences they would not have received if represented by counsel. Jones v. Wolff, 887 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Mo.App.1994); Snelling v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 859 S.W.2d 755, 756 (Mo.App.1993). Violations of the rules of appellate procedure constitute grounds for dismissal of an appeal. Jones, 887 S.W.2d at 808.
Rule 81.12(a) describes what shall be included in the record on appeal. In this case defendant failed to file "all of the record, proceedings and evidence necessary to the determination" of the questions presented. In particular the legal file did not contain a copy of the pleadings upon which the action was tried, and the record on appeal did not contain a transcript of the hearing on the permanent injunction. An appeal may be dismissed for failure to file an adequate record. Environmental Quality v. Mercantile Trust, 854 S.W.2d 500, 501 (Mo.App.1993).
In addition defendant's brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04 and thus preserves nothing for appellate review. Defendant's jurisdictional statement sets out only two abstract questions of law which defendant identifies as a "jurisdictional constitutional" question and fails to set out any factual data to demonstrate the applicability of any particular constitutional provision under which jurisdiction is sought. See Rule 84.04(b). Defendant's statement of facts contains no facts but only sets out the bare legal assertion that defendant has a constitutional right to have all issues of fact tried at the same time by the same jury. Rule 84.04(c) requires a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented for argument.
Defendant's points relied on fail to state briefly the actions or rulings of the court for which review is sought and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous with citations of authorities thereunder. See Rule 84.04(d); Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 687 (Mo. banc 1978). Points which do not state...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mello v. Giliberto
...are grounds for this court to dismiss the appeal. Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App.1999); Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 956 S.W.2d 425, 426 (Mo.App.1997). However, in this case we exercise our discretion to ex gratia review plaintiff's claims in order to re......
-
Mullenix-St. Charles Properties, L.P. v. City of St. Charles
...with analysis or authority in the argument section of the brief, thus abandoning this claim. Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 956 S.W.2d 425, 426 (Mo.App.1997) Plaintiffs argue under this point that the trial court erred in concluding the application of the master meter bi......
-
State v. Jackson
...to comply with the rules of appellate procedure constitutes grounds for the dismissal of an appeal. Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 956 S.W.2d 425, 426 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). Appellant's flagrant violation of every applicable provision of the mandatory briefing requirements ......
-
Jones v. Jones
...Cty. Concerned Citizens v. Mo. Dept. of Natural Resources, 51 S.W.3d 904, 908 (Mo.App.2001); see also Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 956 S.W.2d 425, 426 (Mo.App. 1997). "Notwithstanding noncompliance with Rule 84.04, appellate courts may exercise discretion and attempt t......
-
Section 5.17 Correcting or Supplementing the Record
...filing of the respondent’s brief. Coyne v. Coyne, 17 S.W.3d 904 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000); Faith Baptist Church of Berkeley, Inc. v. Heffner, 956 S.W.2d 425, 426 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997); Rules 30.04(c), 81.12(c). If anything material is omitted from the record, the parties, by stipulation, or the c......