Fantroy v. State

Decision Date26 February 1910
Citation166 Ala. 27,51 So. 931
PartiesFANTROY v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Barbour County; A. A. Evans, Judge.

Balkom Fantroy was convicted of assault and battery, and he appeals. Reversed.

McClellan, J., dissenting.

The charge referred to is as follows: "The court charges the jury, if the defendant shot under the bona fide belief that his life was in danger, and he had under all the circumstances reasonable cause to believe he was in imminent danger, it would be immaterial whether there was such actual danger or not."

Robert J. Lowe and C. S. McDowell, Jr., for appellant.

Alexander M. Garber, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SIMPSON, J.

The appellant was indicted for assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of assault and battery.

The only question raised in the record is as to the correctness of the action of the court in refusing to give the charge requested in writing by the defendant. The charge requested in writing by the defendant, and refused by the court, is an exact copy of a charge which has been held to be good by this court. Kennedy v. State, 140 Ala. 1, 6, 8, 37 So. 90. The court erred in refusing to give said charge.

The judgment of the court is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

DOWDELL, C.J., and ANDERSON, MAYFIELD, and SAYRE, JJ., concur. McCLELLAN, J., dissents. EVANS, J., not sitting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Abercrombie v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 11, 1948
    ...v. State, 140 Ala. 1, 37 So. 90; Snyder v. State, 145 Ala. 33, 40 So. 978; Gaston v. State, 161 Ala. 37, 49 So. 876; Fantroy v. State, 166 Ala. 27, 51 So. 931; v. State, 171 Ala. 37, 55 So. 124. This court approved the charge in Trammell v. State, 1 Ala.App. 83, 55 So. 431, but disapproved ......
  • Cox v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 1923
    ...v. State, 172 Ala. 374, 55 So. 615; Caldwell v. State, 160 Ala. 96, 49 So. 679; Twitty v. State, 168 Ala. 59, 53 So. 308; Fantroy v. State, 166 Ala. 27, 51 So. 931; Kennedy v. State, 140 Ala. 1, 37 So. Defendant had the right to act upon the appearance of things, such appearance as would in......
  • Powell v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1912
    ... ... 2 and 3 are faulty, in that each pretermits an honest ... belief on the part of the defendant that the deceased was ... about to attack him at the time the defendant fired the fatal ... shot. Cheney v. State (Sup.) 55 So. 801. The cases ( ... Kennedy v. State, 140 Ala. 1, 37 So. 90; Fantroy ... v. State, 166 Ala. 27, 51 So. 931; Trammell v ... State, 1 Ala. App. 83, 55 So. 431) cited by appellant in ... support of these charges will be found, upon investigation in ... each instance in the charges passed upon, to approve charges ... predicating a bona fide belief upon the part of ... ...
  • Combs v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 6, 1936
    ... ... is that they have a reasonable doubt as to the facts ... Waller ... v. Stale, 44 So. 825; Keith v. Slate, 111 So. 914; ... McCain v. State, 49 So. 361; Suel v. Derricott, 49 ... So. 895; [175 Miss. 378] ... Fantroy ... v. State, 51 So. 931; Hubbard v. State, 55 So, 614; ... Glass v. State, 78 So. 819; Ransom v. State, 115 So ... W. D ... Conn, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, for the state ... The ... facts of the case at bar do not, make the case presented by ... Beasiey v. State, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT