Farias v. Santoro
| Decision Date | 05 April 2017 |
| Docket Number | No. 1:15-cv-01619-DAD-JLT (HC),1:15-cv-01619-DAD-JLT (HC) |
| Citation | Farias v. Santoro, No. 1:15-cv-01619-DAD-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr 05, 2017) |
| Parties | RICHARD EUGENE FARIAS, Petitioner, v. KELLY SANTORO, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California |
[TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE]
Petitioner is currently serving an indeterminate sentence of 30 years to life plus 5 years for his conviction of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and felony driving under the influence causing great bodily injury.Petitioner is proceeding with the instant habeas action claiming: 1) The trial court erred by allowing an expert to testify as to the theory of Retrograde Alcohol Extrapolation related to Petitioner's blood alcohol content at the time of the accident; 2) Defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to properly object to the admission of the expert testimony; and 3) The trial court abused its discretion by imposing consecutive sentences.As discussed below, the Court finds the claims to be without merit and recommends the petition be DENIED.
Petitioner was convicted in the Madera County Superior Court on November 20, 2012, of two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated (Cal. Penal Code § 191.5(a)), one count of driving while under the influence causing injury (Cal. Vehicle Code § 23153(a), and one count of driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or greater causing injury (Cal. Vehicle Code § 23153(b)).People v. Farias, No. F066500, 2014 WL 6066121, at *1(Cal. Ct. App.2014).The jury also found true the special allegations that Petitioner had a prior conviction for driving under the influence and that he had caused great bodily injury to a victim.Id.
Petitioner appealed to the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District("Fifth DCA").The Fifth DCA affirmed the judgment on November 14, 2014.Id.Petitioner filed a petition for review on December 26, 2014, in the California Supreme Court.(LD1 29.)The petition was summarily denied on January 28, 2015.(LD 30.)
On October 26, 2015, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus in this Court.(Doc. No. 1.)Respondent filed an answer on March 8, 2016.(Doc. No. 18.)Petitioner filed a traverse to Respondent's answer on June 27, 2016.(Doc. No. 24.)
The Court adopts the Statement of Facts in the Fifth DCA's unpublished decision2:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting