Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Martin
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Critz |
| Citation | Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Martin, 88 S.W.2d 459, 126 Tex. 417 (Tex. 1935) |
| Decision Date | 04 December 1935 |
| Docket Number | No. 6925.,6925. |
| Parties | FARM & HOME SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. MARTIN. |
Donald & Donald, of Bowie, and Thos. B. Greenwood, Dan Moody, and J. B. Robertson, all of Austin, for plaintiff in error.
Benson & Benson, of Bowie, and Phillips, Trammell, Chizum, Estes & Edwards and Clayton L. Orn, all of Fort Worth, for defendant in error.
This suit was filed in the district court of Montague county, Tex., by Dan L. Martin against Farm & Home Savings & Loan Association, a private corporation, organized and chartered under the laws of Missouri, with a permit to do business in this state. By petition in the district court Martin sought to have declared paid a certain $3,000 nonnegotiable note or contract executed by him and his wife to the association. Also, Martin sought judgment removing the alleged cloud cast upon his title to certain real property by a certain deed of trust executed by himself and wife for the benefit of this association. Trial in the district court resulted in a take nothing judgment in favor of the association. On appeal by Martin to the Court of Civil Appeals at Fort Worth, that court reversed the judgment of the district court, and rendered judgment for Martin canceling the note and deed of trust, and removing the alleged cloud from his title. 81 S.W. (2d) 779, 786. The association brings error.
The instruments involved in the decision of this case consist of the following:
1. Materialman's lien note for $3,000, dated August 15, 1925, due on or before October 15, 1925, bearing 10 per cent. interest from maturity, payable to the order of Waples-Painter Company, and executed by Dan L. Martin and his wife.
2. Mechanic's lien contract, dated August 15, 1925, covering lots 9 and 10, in block 1, Leming addition to the city of Bowie, Montague county, Tex. This instrument was given to secure the above note, and it and the note were for labor and material to be furnished by Waples-Painter Company in building on the above-described lots. The improvements were to be erected for the purpose of enabling Martin and his wife to use such premises as a residence homestead, and they own no other property.
3. Application for stock, signed by Dan L. Martin, directed to this association, and dated July 17, 1925.
4. Application for loan, signed by Dan L. Martin, directed to this association, and dated July 17, 1925.
5. Note for $3,000, executed by Dan L. Martin and his wife, payable to this association, and dated September 19, 1925.
6. Deed of trust executed by Dan L. Martin and wife to Lee B. Ewing, trustee for this association, dated September 19, 1925, and covering the above-described lots and improvements. This deed of trust secures this $3,000 debt with interest.
7. Stock certificate issued by this association for $3,000 of its stock, issued to Dan L. Martin, and dated September 19, 1925. This certificate was not delivered to Martin, but was retained by the association to secure Martin's loan and stock subscription.
8. Receipt for $3,000, executed by Dan L. Martin and wife to this association, and dated September 19, 1925.
We assume that the above note and mechanic's lien contract by Martin and wife to Waples-Painter Company created a valid and subsisting mechanic's lien on the above-described lots and improvements. We also assume that this association furnished the money to take up and extend such note and lien, and that this association was subrogated to all the equities and liens held by the original holder of the Waples-Painter instruments.
We now come to describe in detail the pertinent portions of the instruments referred to above under 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. These instruments are rather long, and it will require a rather extended statement to detail their pertinent contents.
The application for stock mentioned under 3, supra, signed by Martin and directed to this association, reads as follows:
The application for loan mentioned under 4, supra, signed by Martin and directed to this association, states that Martin desires to obtain a loan from the association for $3,000, to be secured by a first lien on the property above described; that the property is a homestead; that Martin is married; that the monthly dues on stock in the association will be $24, and the monthly interest payment $19.50; that such monthly payments will continue for ninety-seven months, payable monthly in advance, beginning on the date of the deed of trust; that "the undersigned agrees to comply with the rules and by-laws of the association now in existence or that may hereafter be enacted"; that applicant agrees to pay a membership fee of 1 per cent., and a loan expense fee of one-half of 1 per cent. of the amount borrowed; and that applicant will carry insurance for the benefit of the association. This application contains many other provisions, but we think we have stated those germane here.
The $3,000 note to the association, mentioned under 5, supra, is in words and figures as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In re Morales
...lien against a homestead may be subrogated to the mechanic's lien. Crowder, 919 S.W.2d at 661 (citing Farm & Home Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Martin, 126 Tex. 417, 88 S.W.2d 459, 469–70 (1935)). The Texas Supreme Court then found no difference between the refinancing of debt secured by a mechanic'......
-
In re Morales
...lien against a homestead may be subrogated to the mechanic's lien. Crowder, 919 S.W.2d at 661 (citing Farm & Home Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Martin, 126 Tex. 417, 88 S.W.2d 459, 469–70 (1935) ). The Texas Supreme Court then found no difference between the refinancing of debt secured by a mechanic......
-
Benchmark Bank v. Crowder
...a debt secured by a valid mechanic's lien against a homestead may be subrogated to the lien. Farm & Home Sav. & Loan Ass'n. v. Martin, 126 Tex. 417, 88 S.W.2d 459, 469-70 (1935). We see no difference between the refinancing of debt secured by a mechanic's lien and the refinancing of debt se......
-
Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Oklahoma v. Baxter
... ... 209, 86 N.E. 1032; Hough v ... Maupin, 73 Ark. 518, 84 S.W. 717; Farm & Home ... Sav's & Loan Ass'n v. Martin, 126 Tex. 417, 88 ... S.W.2d ... ...