Farmers Elevator Mut. Ins. Co. v. Burch
Decision Date | 17 December 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 62-0-5,62-0-5 |
Citation | 187 N.E.2d 12,38 Ill.App.2d 249 |
Parties | FARMERS ELEVATOR MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Zora M. BURCH et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
J. E. Horsley, W. E. Larrabee, of Craig & Craig, Mattoon, Parker, Bauer & Parker, Effingham, Paul D. Wilson, General Counsel, Farmers Elevator Mutual Ins. Co., Des Moines, Iowa, of counsel, for appellant.
L. E. Brumleve, Joseph B. Siemer, of Siemer, Brumleve & Dehn, Effingham, for appellees.
The action now before us originated as a suit for declaratory judgment seeking determination as to a policy of liability insurance issued by plaintiff, Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company to defendant, Effingham Equity, Inc., through a series of transactions giving rise to damages claimed against said Effingham Equity, Inc., by other defendants.
The action was filed under the provisions of Chapter 110, Section 57.1(1961 Illinois Revised Statutes), and sought a determination as to whether the allegations contained in a complaint in another action of Burch et al. v. Effingham Equity, Inc., set up facts which would bring the occurrence within the scope of the policy coverages. The policy under consideration contained these provisions:
The complaint in the case under consideration, of Burch et al. v. Effingham Equity, Inc., alleged in substance that over a period in excess of two months Effingham Equity, Inc., had maintained a nuisance in the operation of its elevator and had caused or permitted dust from grain, etc. to enter the permises of plaintiffs and caused them physical injury and certain damage to household goods, lawns, and gardens; and also, that the elevator company operated machinery over that period of time causing great vibration which damaged plaintiffs home and other buildings, and made loud noises which annoyed plaintiffs. The elevator company demanded that the insurance company defend its suit under the policy. The insurance company asserted that since the policy provided only for damages 'caused by accident' it considered the policy did not apply. Thereafter, the declaratory judgment action was instituted. Defendant answered the declaratory complaint and also prayed for declaratory judgment and asserted certain additional defenses. On trial of the cause by the Court, without a jury, defendant Effingham Equity, Inc., offered no evidence. Following the hearing the Trial Court entered an order that plaintiff take nothing by its suit, and in substance, that the Court has no power to render a judgment or decree on an anticipated liability which may or may not arise in the future.
While the declaratory judgment act introduced a new concept unknown at common law, its beneficial effect should not be destroyed by illiberal construction (Trossman v. Trossman, 24 Ill.App.2d 521, 524, 165 N.E.2d 368, 80 A.L.R.2d 933). In the instant case the complaint does not allege any damages sustained...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stoneridge Development Co. v. Essex Ins.
...consequences of an act do not constitute an accident, relied on another appellate court case, Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Co. v. Burch, 38 Ill.App.2d 249, 253, 187 N.E.2d 12 (1962), which in turn relied on a supreme court case, Yates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 415 Ill. 16, 19, 11......
-
Apex Mut. Ins. Co. v. Christner
...425, 185 N.E.2d 719; Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bergman, 38 Ill.App.2d 268, 185 N.E.2d 513; Farmers Elevator Mutual Ins. Co. v. Burch, 38 Ill.App.2d 249, 187 N.E.2d 12; Farmers Automobile Ins. Ass'n. v. Hamblin, 42 Ill.App.2d 482, 192 N.E.2d 450; Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. ......
-
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Freyer
...character. The natural and ordinary consequences of an act do not constitute an accident. (Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Co. v. Burch (1962), 38 Ill.App.2d 249, 187 N.E.2d 12.) An injury caused by an assault and battery normally is not considered to be accidental (Briscoe v. Travelers I......
-
Cobbins v. General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.
...bodily injury * * * caused by accident * * *.' The word 'accident' has no settled legal meaning. See Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Co. v. Burch, 38 Ill.App.2d 249, 252, 187 N.E.2d 12. In an insurance policy like the one before us, it is used in the sense in which the word is commonly un......