Fatehi v. Johnson
| Decision Date | 05 December 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. S54162.,S54162. |
| Citation | 149 P.3d 138,342 Or. 116 |
| Parties | FATEHI v. JOHNSON |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Worman v. Columbia County
...evidence" and is "not required to believe the testimony of * * * the plaintiff or of any other witness"); see also Fatehi v. Johnson, 207 Or.App. 719, 730, 143 P.3d 561, rev. den., 342 Or. 116, 149 P.3d 138 (2006) (jury entitled to disbelieve a witness "thought by the jury to have an intere......
-
York v. Paakkonen
...maintain the “general” and “special” distinction recognized in the older cases where appropriate. See generally Fatehi v. Johnson, 207 Or.App. 719, 723 n. 1, 143 P.3d 561,rev. den.,342 Or. 116, 149 P.3d 138 (2006) (explaining the historical use and evolution of the terminology). 3. Plaintif......
-
Williams v. Funk
...the trial court reasoned, "under the [Wheeler] case, [Wheeler v. Huston, 288 Or. 467, 483, 605 P.2d 1339 (1980)], as explained to us in the [Fatehi] case, * * * [Fatehi v. Johnson, 207 Or. App. 719, 723, 143 P.3d 561, rev. den., 342 Or. 116, 149 P.3d 138 (2006)], that instruction is not to ......