Fawcett v. Supreme Sitting of Order of Iron Hall
Decision Date | 06 March 1894 |
Citation | 64 Conn. 170,29 A. 614 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | FAWCETT v. SUPREME SITTING OF ORDER OF IRON HALL. |
Case reserved from superior court, Fairfield county; Ralph Wheeler, Judge.
Action by John Fawcett against the Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall, a corporation organized under the laws of Indiana, for the appointment of a receiver for the property of defendant in Connecticut. Edwin L. Scofield was appointed such receiver, and the branches of defendant in the state paid to him the funds in their possession. Such branches and James F. Failey, the receiver of defendant, appointed by the courts of Indiana, interpleaded and claimed such funds. Facts found and case reserved.
William F. Henney, Lucius P. Deming, James Bishop, and Henry G. Newton, for the Connecticut branches of the order. Henry C. Robinson, for James F. Failey.
The Supreme Sitting of the Order of the Iron Hall was duly incorporated, under the general laws of the state of Indiana, in 1881. Its corporate purposes were defined, in the third of its articles of association, as being "to unite in bonds of union, protection, and forbearance all acceptable white persons of good character, steady habits, sound bodily health, and reputable calling, who believe in a supreme intelligent being, the creator and preserver of the universe; to improve the condition of its membership, morally, socially, and materially, by instructive lessons, judicious counsel, and timely aid, by encouragement in business, and by assistance to obtain employment when in need; to establish a benefit fund, from which members of the said order who have complied with all its rules and regulations, or the heirs of such member, may receive a benefit in a sum not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), which shall be paid in such sums and at such times as may be provided by the laws governing such payment, or in the certificate of membership, and when all the conditions regulating such payment have been complied with." Its "proper officers" were to have "power at any time when a liability on account of the sickness, disability, or maturity of certificate of a member entitled to a benefit under number three of these articles occurs, to make the proper and specified assessment, under the prescribed regulation, to meet such liability."
By article 2, § 3, of the "Constitution" of the order, duly adopted pursuant to its articles of association, one of its objects was particularly declared to be "to establish a benefit fund, from which those who have held membership in the order for thirty days or more may, should they so desire, on proper application, and complying with all the rules and regulations governing said benefit fund, become participants therein, and may receive the benefit of a sum not exceeding twenty-five dollars per week, nor more than one-half of the sum total held by each member, when, by reason of disease or accident, they become disabled from following their usual occupation, or an amount of not more than one thousand dollars when they have held a continuous membership in the order for seven years: provided, however, that the sum total drawn from this order by any of its members shall never exceed, both in sick, disability, and other benefits, the sum named in the certificate of membership."
Among the "Laws of the Supreme Sitting," made pursuant to its constitution, were the following:
Law I.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Clark v. Williard
...390; Buswell v. Supreme Sitting of Order of Iron Hall, 161 Mass. 224, 36 N.E. 1065, 23 L.R.A. 846; Fawcett v. Supreme Sitting of Order of Iron Hall, 64 Conn. 170, 29 A. 614, 24 L.R.A. 815; People v. Granite State Provident Association, 161 N.Y. 492, 55 N.E. To resume: The Supreme Court of M......
-
Van Woert v. Modern Woodmen of America
... ... 1905 Supreme" Court of North Dakota February 6, 1915 ... \xC2" ... 574, ... 116 S.W. 1130; Fawcett v. Supreme Sitting, O. I. H ... 64 Conn. 170, ... truthful answer in order that it might make such further ... ...
-
Receivers of Middlesex Banking Co. v. Realty Inv. Co.
... ... v. REALTY INV. CO. Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut.February 23, 1926 ... court thereupon made an order giving that approval, and ... directing that the ... in its sound discretion. Fawcett v. Iron Hall, 29 A ... 614, 64 Conn. 170, 185, ... ...
-
Nashua Savings Bank v. Anglo-American Land-Mortgage & Agency Co.
... ... Smith, 14 ... How. 426, 14 L.Ed. 472; Hall v. Costello, 48 N.H ... 176; Kennard v ... should not be accorded to it in order to establish or aid a ... recovery, but, on the ... and alien countries. The opinion of the supreme court by Mr ... Justice Gray in Hilton v ... 461, 33 N.E. 580; Fawcett ... v. Iron Hall, 64 Conn. 170, 29 A. 614; ... ...