Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Waldron

Decision Date26 September 1980
Docket NumberNo. 79-1734,79-1734
PartiesFEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee, v. Scott M. WALDRON; Herbert L. Benson, Jr.; Truitt H. Casey; Vermelle Roland Fagan, Executrix of the Estate of Wylie H. Fagan, deceased; and L. G. Funderburk, Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Joe E. Berry, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (Berry, Dunbar & Woods, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellants Benson, Casey and Funderburk.

Robert G. Price, Columbia, S. C. (Kennedy & Price, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellant Fagan.

Hamilton Osborne, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (Boyd, Knowlton, Tate & Finaly, Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:

This action to collect on a guaranty of a corporate note was brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) against Scott M. Waldron, Herbert L. Benson, Jr., Truitt H. Casey, Vermelle Roland Fagan, Executrix of the Estate of Wylie H. Fagan, Deceased, and L. G. Funderburk (Guarantors). The district court granted summary judgment to the FDIC based on depositions and affidavits. The Guarantors appeal. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

The American Bank and Trust Company (the Bank) loaned $135,000.00 to Terracorp, Inc. in July, 1972. The five Guarantors simultaneously executed an agreement guaranteeing payment of the corporate note. The Bank closed in September, 1974. FDIC became the Bank's successor in interest and received the guaranty agreement as one of the Bank's assets. Although the guaranty agreement was for $135,000.00, it was a continuing guarantee. The individuals guaranteed $135,000.00 in connection with the July, 1972, corporate note, or up to a total of $135,000.00 for that or any loans made to the corporation in the future. In January, 1973, Terracorp, Inc. executed a second note at the Bank in the amount of $135,000.00, guaranteed by only one of the original Guarantors, Scott M. Waldron. Waldron subsequently declared bankruptcy and has been discharged from all indebtedness to the FDIC.

The Guarantors contend that the original guaranty agreement, although in form a continuing loan guaranty, was only a guaranty for the specific loan negotiated in July, 1972. They further assert that the second corporate note of January, 1973, guaranteed by Waldron only, paid the original July, 1972, corporate indebtedness and released the four solvent Guarantors. The vice-president of the Bank who made the loans stated in his affidavit that "(the 1972 note) was executed solely in connection with (that) particular loan." He also said that it was orally understood that Benson, Casey, Funderburk and Fagan would be released from the original $135,000.00 obligation when the second corporate note was executed.

The Bank subsequently loaned Terracorp, Inc. $850,000.00, evidenced by five promissory notes. There were no individual guarantees and the notes remain uncollected.

The Guarantors' argument that Terracorp, Inc. paid its January, 1972 obligation with its second corporate note, thereby releasing the Guarantors, fails on several grounds. A written agreement under South Carolina law can be modified by an oral agreement but it must be supported by consideration. Evatt v. Campbell, 234 S.C. 1, 106 S.E.2d 447 (1959); American Oil Co. v. Cox, 182 S.C. 419, 189 S.E. 660 (1937). The South Carolina Supreme Court has explicitly held that a renewal note does not constitute adequate consideration for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • FDIC v. Eagle Properties, Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • September 25, 1985
    ...FDIC v. First Mortgage Investors, 485 F.Supp. 445, 451 (E.D.Wis.1980); FDIC v. Waldron, 472 F.Supp. 21, 25 (D.S.C. 1979), aff. 630 F.2d 239 (4th Cir. 1980); Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Smith, 466 F.Supp. 843, 845 (N.D.La. 1979). This law is based not on a theory of holder in du......
  • Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Percival
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nebraska
    • August 31, 1990
    ...Public Loan Co. v. FDIC, 803 F.2d 82, 84-85 (3rd Cir.1986); FDIC v. Castle, 781 F.2d 1101, 1108 (5th Cir.1986); FDIC v. Waldron, 630 F.2d 239, 241 (4th Cir.1980), the courts held only that § 1823(e) defeated the asserted defenses of oral side agreements limiting liability. Indeed, in Firsts......
  • HR v. Hornbeck
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • September 24, 1981
    ... ... that plaintiffs, prior to bringing this action in federal court, must exhaust the administrative remedies provided by ... Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 50-51, 58 S.Ct. 459, 463-64, 82 L.Ed. 638 ... ...
  • Simopoulos v. Virginia State Bd. of Medicine
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • March 19, 1981
    ... ... on (his) part to pursue dual appeals in state and federal courts on the same questions. Dr. Simopoulos' appeal ... Cf. S.E.C. v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 92-95, 63 S.Ct. 454, 461-62, 87 L.Ed. 626 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT