Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Cloonan
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PARKER, Justice. |
| Citation | Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Cloonan, 165 Kan. 440, 196 P.2d 195 (Kan. 1948) |
| Decision Date | 10 July 1948 |
| Docket Number | 37083-37085. |
| Parties | FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORPORATION v. CLOONAN et al. (three cases). |
Appeal from District Court, Labette County; Larue E. Goodrich Judge.
Two actions by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against H. J. Cloonan on promissory notes, and action by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against H. J. Cloonan and another on a promissory note. From judgments sustaining demurrers to the amended petitions plaintiff appeals, and defendant Helen M. Cloonan in the third action appeals from a judgment overruling her demurrer to the amended petition. Actions consolidated for appellate purposes.
Syllabus by the Court
1. Under the negotiable instruments law of this state (G.S 1935, 52-218) no person is liable on a promissory note whose signature does not appear thereon unless liability is expressly imposed by other provisions of such law.
2. The amended petitions in three actions involving liability on as many promissory notes examined, and it is held, the trial court did not err in holding that such pleadings failed to state a cause of action against a defendant whose signature did not appear upon the instruments sued on.
3. The amended petition in Case No. 37,083 examined, and held, to state a cause of action against a defendant who had signed the note involved in that action.
A. L Foster, of Parsons, for appellant and appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Elmer W. Columbia, of Parsons (John B. Markham and Herman W. Smith Jr., both of Parsons, on the brief), for appellee H. J. Cloonan and appellant Helen M. Cloonan.
In these three actions, consolidated in this court for appellate purposes, the plaintiff is attempting to recover a judgment against the defendant, H. J. Cloonan, on three promissory notes. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining such defendant's demurrers to its amended petitions.
Case No. 37,083 presents one additional issue. Helen M. Cloonan joined with her husband H. J. Cloonan, as a party defendant in that action appeals from a judgment overruling her demurrer to the amended petition. No further attention will be given this phase of the appeal until the issue common to all cases has been outlined and determined. Until it is discussed the words 'defendant' or 'appellee' have reference to H. J. Cloonan only and the word 'appellant' signifies the plaintiff corporation.
The theory on which plaintiff bases its right of recovery against the defendant cannot be clearly visualized except by a detailed recital of the allegations set forth in one of the involved pleadings. Therefore we feel impelled to quote at length from the amended petition in case No. 37,084 which, omitting formal matters and other allegations not deemed material, reads:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Plains State Bank v. Ellis
...not go to judgment as in the case at bar, has had occasion to construe the foregoing section of our statute. In Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Cloonan, 165 Kan. 440, 196 P.2d 195, we 'Under the negotiable instruments law of this state (G.S.1935, 52-218) no person is liable on a promissory no......
- Ellsworth v. Worthey
-
Wenzel Machinery Rental & Sales Co. v. Adkins
...on Plains State Bank v. Ellis, 174 Kan. 653, 258 P.2d 313, appellees strenuously contend that case, we well as Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Cloonan, 165 Kan. 440, 196 P.2d 195, require an affirmative answer to the question just posed. We do not In the first place both cases are factually d......
-
Sims v. Sugg
... ... same effect is State ex rel. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v ... Cox, 306 Mo. 537, 268 S.W. 87, 37 A.L.R. 1456 ... ...