Federal Trade Commission v. Carter Products
Decision Date | 12 October 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 114,114 |
Parties | FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CARTER PRODUCTS, Inc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment and order after amending it so that it specifically authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the Court of Appeals opinion herein. Cf. Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269, 277, 70 S.Ct. 110, 114, 94 L.Ed. 63; National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co., 330 U.S. 219, 224—228, 67 S.Ct. 756, 759—761, 91 L.Ed. 854.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carter Products, Inc. v. FTC
...Trade Commission. On certiorari, the Supreme Court vacated this judgment and remanded the cause to this court with directions. 346 U.S. 327, 74 S.Ct. 2, 98 L.Ed. 4. This court thereupon entered judgment as directed by the mandate of the Supreme Pursuant to our judgment remanding the cause t......
-
Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Com'n
...73, 60 F.Supp. at 527; City of Alton v. Commerce Comm'n, supra note 69, 165 N.E.2d at 523; see also FTC v. Carter Prods., Inc., 346 U.S. 327, 74 S.Ct. 2, 98 L.Ed. 4 (1953) (per curiam); FPC v. Idaho Power Co., 344 U.S. 17, 20, 73 S.Ct. 85, 97 L.Ed. 15 (1952); Eastern-Central Motor Carriers ......
-
Dolcin Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
...1953, 203 F.2d 540. But see Carter Products v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 201 F.2d 446, judgment vacated on other grounds, 1953, 346 U.S. 327, 74 S.Ct. 2. 7 Reilly v. Pinkus, 1949, 338 U.S. 269, 276, 70 S.Ct. 110, 94 L.Ed. 63. See also Lawrence v. Nutter, 4 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 540, ......
-
Generella v. Weinberger
...(8th Cir. 1970); Carter Products v. Federal Trade Commission, 201 F.2d 446, 449 (9th Cir. 1953), vacated on other grounds, 346 U. S. 327, 74 S.Ct. 2, 98 L.Ed. 4; United States v. One Device, etc., 160 F.2d 194, 198-199 (10th Cir. 1947); Anno., 65 A. L.R. 1102. There are exceptions to this r......