Feldman v. Feldman
Decision Date | 09 December 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 80-62,80-62 |
Citation | 390 So.2d 1231 |
Parties | Isaac FELDMAN, Appellant, v. Zena K. FELDMAN, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Weintraub, Weintraub, Seiden, Dudley & Press and Albert L. Weintraub, Miami, for appellant.
Markus & Winter and Laurie S. Silvers, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
The portions of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded attorneys' fees in the amount of $10,000 to the wife, Zena Feldman, and ordered Isaac Feldman to transfer to Zena twenty-six per cent of the operating capital of American Men's Wear Clothing Company, Inc., are reversed upon holdings that (1) the failure of the wife to offer expert testimony to establish the reasonableness of the attorneys' fees vitiates the award, Alexander Muss & Sons, Inc. v. Nelson, 366 So.2d 532(Fla. 3d DCA1979);Wilson v. Wilson, 362 So.2d 1030(Fla. 3d DCA1978);Segal v. Segal, 353 So.2d 894(Fla. 3d DCA1977);Lee v. Gilbert, Silverstein & Hellman, P. A., 350 So.2d 1147(Fla. 3d DCA1977);(2)the trial court, although well within its authority to order, as it did, the husband to transfer to the wife stock owned by him in American Men's Wear Clothing Company, Inc., was not empowered to order the transfer of the assets of a corporation which was not a party to the litigation, seeCouture v. Couture, 307 So.2d 194(Fla. 3d DCA1975).
Since the wife's failure to offer...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Goedmakers v. Goedmakers
...to order the wife to transfer stock owned by her to the husband. Noe v. Noe, 431 So.2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Feldman v. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).4 We offer no opinion on whether the corporation could be joined as a party since that issue clearly is not presented here.5 T......
-
Keller v. Keller
...This corporation was not joined as a party and, thus, the trial court had no power to transfer this corporate asset. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). See also Ashourian v. Ashourian, 483 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Noe v. Noe, 431 So.2d 657 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We find no abuse......
-
Iribar v. Iribar, 86-2125
...Poitier v. Poitier, 458 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Maggio v. Maggio, 405 So.2d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Feldman v. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231, 1232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Second, we see no merit in the wife's attack on the rehabilitative alimony award. The award was strictly a bridge-the......
-
Markham v. Markham
...dissent, Travieso v. Travieso, 474 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1985) (the failure to offer expert proof vitiates the award). Feldman v. Feldman, 390 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980) (remanded with directions that wife be afforded opportunity to present testimony where she initially failed to offer such p......