Felix v. Gov't of the Virgin Islands
Decision Date | 12 November 1958 |
Docket Number | Civil No. 158 — 1958 |
Citation | 3 V.I. 399 |
Parties | OTIS L. FELIX v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, John D. Merwin, Governor; Roy W. Bornn, Government Secretary; George A. Matthias, Commissioner of Public Safety, and Percy De Jongh, Commissioner of Finance |
Court | U.S. District Court — Virgin Islands |
See, also, 167 F. Supp. 702
Motion to dismiss petition against Government of Virgin Islands and certain executive officials for reinstatement of petitioner as Insular Chief of Police and for back salary. The District Court,Maris, Circuit Judge, denied the motion holding that court had jurisdiction and could grant petitioner relief requested.
Order in accordance with opinion.EDITH L. BORNN, ESQ., JAMES A. BOUGH, ESQ. AND DAVID E. MAAS, ESQ., Charlotte Amalie, for the plaintiff
LEON P. MILLER, ESQ., United States Attorney, Charlotte Amalie, Virgin Islands, for the defendants
[1] The plaintiff, Otis L. Felix, claiming that he was wrongfully dismissed from employment in the service of the Government of the Virgin Islands, brings this action against the defendants, the Government of the Virgin Islands, John D. Merwin, Governor, Roy W. Bornn, Government Secretary, George A. Matthias, Commissioner of Public Safety, and Percy DeJongh, Commissioner of Finance, seeking reinstatement in this position as Insular Chief of Police and salary from the date of his dismissal. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the petition. In considering the defendants' motion I must take the facts as stated by the plaintiff as true.
The plaintiff on the morning of February 26, 1958, while in the midst of performing his official duties as Insular Chief of Police, was called into the office of GeorgeA. Matthias, Commissioner of Public Safety, and handed a letter dated the preceding day and reading as follows:
About five hours later that day the plaintiff was handed a letter from the then Government Secretary, John D. Merwin, now Governor of the Virgin Islands, to the then Governor, Walter A. Gordon, recommending approval of plaintiff's dismissal. Handwritten on the same letter wasthe approval by Governor Gordon of plaintiff's immediate dismissal. The letter reads as follows:
The plaintiff appealed from his dismissal to the Government Employees Service Commission1 and was granteda hearing on July 17, 1958. His contention before the Commission was that the procedure employed by the authorities gave him no opportunity to file a written statement regarding his dismissal, a right accorded him under section 530, Title 3, V.I.C. The Commission submitted its report of the hearing and its findings to the Governor, which, in pertinent part were as follows:
Title 3, section 530 of the Virgin Islands Code reads as follows:
Government Secretary Merwin explained that as this employee was asked to resign since December of 1957, he felt that he had sufficient time between December 1957 and February 26, 1958, to make representations to the Governor and, further, as the position was an important and sensitive one, he felt justified in recommending his immediate dismissal.
On July 28, 1958, Ullmont L. James, Director of Personnel, notified David E. Maas, Esquire, one of the plaintiff's attorneys, by letter as follows:
The present action followed. The plaintiff contends that his dismissal being in violation of the mandatory provisions of the Code, was a denial of due process and that he suffered injury thereby by loss of salary from the date of dismissal. He asks this court to declare his dismissal not in accordance with the law, to order the Governor,2 as the appointing authority, and the Government Secretary, as the administrator of the Personnel Merit System, to reinstate him in his position as Insular Police Chief, to order the Commissioner of Public Safety to certify plaintiff's salary, and to order the Commissioner of Finance to pay the salary which he contends is due to him.
The defendants urge (1) that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain this suit against the Government of the Virgin Islands, (2) that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Knud Hansen Memorial Hospital
...be outside the scope of their employment." 12 V.I. at 34, 398 F.Supp. at 116-17.6 Compare Felix v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 3 V.I. 399, 407, 167 F.Supp. 702, 706 (D.V.I.1958) (Maris, J.) (section 2(b) authorized contract suits against the Government of the Virgin Islands without ex......
-
Richards v. Christian
...in the form of amotion to dismiss, "I must take the facts as stated by the plaintiff as true." Felix v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 3 V.I. 399, 401, 167 F.Supp. 702 (D.C.V.I. 1958). [3] On this standard, the easiest of the petitioner's contentions to dispose of is no. 4. Taking the al......
-
Samuels v. Gov't Emps. Serv. Comm'n, 74-86
...from which she had been illegally removed and to her salary from the date of her illegal dismissal. Felix v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 3 V.I. 399, 167 F.Supp. 702 (D.V.I. 1958). I do not think that reinstatement is an appropriate remedy in this case. As will become apparent from my ......