Le Felt v. Aetna Ins Co
| Decision Date | 15 January 1963 |
| Parties | Florence LeFELT et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Petitioners. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Stalter, Doan & De Yoe, Paterson, James H. McLeod, Newark, and Aaron Dines, Morristown, for petitioners.
Archie Elkins and Robert A. Elkins, Jersey City, for respondents.
Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
McNeilab, Inc. v. North River Ins. Co., Civ. A. No. 82-3934.
... ... Co ... Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, New Brunswick, N.J. by Michael B. Oropollo, for defendant Aetna Cas. & Surety Co ... De Gonge, Garrity & Fitzpatrick P.C., Bloomfield, N.J. by Francis X. Garrity, for defendant Granite State ... concept argue that, even given other reasons for mitigation, an unscrupulous insured would have no reason to mitigate at its own expense if it felt it would not be caught allowing damages to mount and, therefore, the additional encouragement of allowing mitigation expenses on an ordinary ... ...
-
U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Kum Gang, Inc., 04-CV-2671 (ILG).
... ... Such a determination might be made moot by a finding of nonliability in the state court action. See Bellefonte Reinsurance Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 590 F.Supp. 187 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (where adjudication of issues by court could become moot on account of decision in ... Jenning, 55 Wash.2d 725, 349 P.2d 1071; Le Felt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J.Super. 538, 177 A.2d 315, aff'd; 76 N.J.Super. 576, 185 A.2d 217, cert. Den. 39 N.J. 86, 187 A.2d 600; Allstate v. Shelby Mut ... ...
-
Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd. v. Concord Ins. Co.
...71 N.J.Super. 538, 177 A.2d 315 (Law Div. 1962), aff'd 76 N.J.Super. 576, 185 A.2d 217 (App.Div.1962), certif. den. LeFelt v. Aetna Ins. Co., 39 N.J. 86, 187 A.2d 600 (1963), the very issue of declaratory relief was determined by the Appellate Division on review from the Law The next issue ......
-
Cheatham v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.
...177 A.2d 315 (Law Div.1962), aff'd o.b. 76 N.J.Super. 576, 185 A.2d 217 (App.Div.1962), certif. den. sub nom. LeFelt v. Aetna Ins. Co., 39 N.J. 86, 187 A.2d 600 (1963). Here the isolated use of the vehicle to carry cleaning supplies was a convenience to Hood. The vehicle was simply personal......
Request a trial to view additional results