Fendley v. United States, 24554.

Decision Date02 November 1967
Docket NumberNo. 24554.,24554.
Citation384 F.2d 923
PartiesWilliam C. FENDLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant.

William J. Hamilton, Jr., First Asst. U. S. Atty., Samuel S. Forman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Edward F. Boardman U. S. Atty., Middle Dist. of Florida, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and HEEBE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The defendant was in state custody at the time of his interrogation by the FBI.The interrogation was an important part of the federal criminal proceedings which had obviously then focused on the defendant.As was the case in Miranda this was an interrogation "in a police-dominated atmosphere."Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 445, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694(1966).At a hearing conducted by the district judge on the admissibility of a statement by the defendant taken at that interrogation, the FBI agent testified that the defendant was advised that he"had the right to remain silent, that he didn't have to make any statement, that if he did make any statement, it could be used against him in a court of law."Although the agent stated that he also advised the defendant that "he had the right to consult an attorney or anyone else before making a statement," and that "if he did not have any money to obtain an attorney that the Judge, the Court, would appoint one for him when he went to court,"the defendant was not advised, as Miranda requires, of his right to have court-appointedcounsel present during the interrogation.Although the interrogation was made and the defendant's statement taken prior to the Miranda decision, the trial took place subsequent to Miranda and the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
32 cases
  • Lathers v. United States, 24226.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 23 Mayo 1968
    ...in the event he was arrested. The confession which followed that warning was excluded by this court. Similarly, in Fendley v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 384 F.2d 923, a confession was excluded where the defendant was warned that "he had the right to consult an attorney or anyone else befor......
  • State v. Maluia
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • 11 Septiembre 1975
    ...of the cases cited in the dissent as holding compliance was inadequate 11 are wide of the mark here. Defendant cites Fendley v United States, 384 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1967), and Lathers v. United States, 396 F.2d 524 (5th Cir. 1968). In Fendley defendant was told the court would appoint an at......
  • U.S. v. Caldwell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 18 Febrero 1992
    ...of counsel during the interrogation); Windsor v. United States, 389 F.2d 530, 533 (5th Cir.1968) (same); Fendley v. United States, 384 F.2d 923 (5th Cir.1967) (per curiam) (warnings held to be insufficient since they did not advise of the right to have appointed counsel present during the T......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1975
    ...1970); Lathers v. United States, 396 F.2d 524 (5 Cir. 1968); Sullins v. United States, 389 F.2d 985 (10 Cir. 1968); Fendley v. United States, 384 F.2d 923 (5 Cir. 1967); Square v. State, 283 Ala. 548, 219 So.2d 377 (1969); Reese v. State, 462 P.2d 331 (Okl.Cr.1969); State v. Creach, 77 Wash......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT