Fenstermaker's Estate, In re

Decision Date24 March 1964
Citation198 A.2d 857,413 Pa. 645
PartiesIn re ESTATE of John E. FENSTERMAKER. Appeal of Charles F. FENSTERMAKER and Mark J. Serfass, Executors of the Estate of John E. Fenstermaker.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Murray Mackson, Palmerton, for appellant.

William B. Quinn, Lehighton, for appellee.

Before BELL, C. J., and MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

JONES, Justice.

On December 21, 1961, John E. Fenstermaker, [decedent], transferred $19,327.61 from his individual account to a joint savings account in the Tri-County State Bank, Bowmanstown, Pa., [Bank]. The newly opened savings account was captioned 'John E. Fenstermaker or Mrs. Florence Reichard', the latter being decedent's daughter. Decedent obtained a signature card from the Bank, took it to Mrs. Reichard's home and returned the signature card to the Bank, admittedly signed by decedent and Mrs. Reichard.

This signature card read as follows:

'Authorized Signatures of Account No. 6534

John E. Fenstermaker or Mrs. Florence Reichard (Subject to

withdrawal by either)

TRI-COUNTY STATE BANK BOWMANSTOWN, PA.

Date 12-22-61

First Deposit $19,327.61

It is agreed and understood that any and all sums that may from time to time stand on this account, to the credit of the undersigned depositors, shall be taken and deemed to belong to them as joint tenants and not as tenants in common; that the funds may be withdrawn by either depositor, only upon presentation of the pass book; and in case of death of either, the Bowmanstown Bank is hereby authorized and directed to deal with the survivor or survivors as sole and absolute owner or owners thereof.

Witness our hands and seals, this 22nd day of December 1961.

Attest:

John E. Fenstermaker (Seal)

Florence Reichard (Seal)

Residence 313 So. 7th, Lehighton, Pa.'

Decedent died, testate, on March 7, 1963. At the time of decedent's death, there was $20,210.42 in the savings account and there had been neither deposits in, nor withdrawals from, this account since its creation.

Under the terms of decedent's will--executed April 17, 1956--decedent's estate was to be distributed, share and share alike, to his three surviving children (including Mrs. Reichard) and a daughter of a deceased child. On June 6, 1963, decedent's personal representatives obtained from the Orphans' Court of Carbon County a rule upon Mrs. Reichard to show cause why the proceeds of the savings account should not be included as an estate asset and delivered by Mrs. Reichard to the personal representatives. After hearing, the court below dismissed the rule as to this savings account. From that order this appeal was taken.

Certain well settled principles in this area of the law must be kept in mind: (1) in the absence of fraud, accident or mistake, '[w]hen a depositor creates a joint savings * * * account with right of survivorship, and a signature card so stating is executed by both parties, these facts are prima facie evidence of a gift inter vivos by the depositor to the other, and of the creation of a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. [citing cases].': Furjanick Estate, 375 Pa. 484, 100 A.2d 85; (2) in the absence of alleged or proven fraud, accident or mistake, if the wording of the savings account and the signature card executed in connection therewith reveals the intent of the depositor clearly and without ambiguity, parol evidence to show a contrary intent is inadmissible; if from the wording of the writings the intent of the depositor appears indefinite or uncertain or ambiguous, then parol evidence is admissible: Furjanick Estate, supra, 375, Pa. 493, 100 A.2d 85; Amour Estate, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Brozenic's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1964
    ...of the gift was a jointly owned bank account or a savings association account. Bunn Estate, 413 Pa. 467, 198 A.2d 518; Fenstermaker Estate, 413 Pa. 645, 198 A.2d 857; Sivak Estate, 409 Pa. 261, 185 A.2d 778; Cox Estate, 405 Pa. 444, 176 A.2d 894; Rogan Estate, 404 Pa. 205, 171 A.2d 177; Ber......
  • In re Brozenic's Estate
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1964
  • King v. Estate of King
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1989
    ...to make withdrawals from the account. See e.g., Commerce Trust Co. v. Watts, 360 Mo. 971, 231 S.W.2d 817 (1950); In re Fenstermaker's Estate, 413 Pa. 645, 198 A.2d 857 (1964); In re Voegeli's Estate, 108 Ohio App. 371, 161 N.E.2d 778 (Ct.App.), appeal dismissed, 169 Ohio St. 237, 158 N.E.2d......
  • Zabek's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • October 9, 1970
    ...Estate, 420 Pa. 504, 218 A.2d 125; Brozenic Estate, 416 Pa. 204, 204 A.2d 918; Bunn Estate, 413 Pa. 467, 198 A.2d 518; Fenstermaker Estate, 413 Pa. 645, 198 A.2d 857; Sivak Estate, 409 Pa. 261, 185 A.2d 778; Cox Estate, 405 Pa. 444, 176 A.2d 894; Rogan Estate, 404 Pa. 205, 171 A.2d 177; Ber......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT