Ferguson v. Truax

Decision Date30 April 1907
Citation132 Wis. 478,111 N.W. 657
PartiesFERGUSON v. TRUAX.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

On motion for rehearing. Granted.

For former opinion, see 110 N. W. 395.

*657PER CURIAM.

Motion for rehearing is granted, without costs, upon proviso that reargument be confined to the following questions:

(1) If the plaintiff had been prohibited by the defendant from using the elevator, could the relation of passenger and carrier exist between them at the time of the accident?

(2) Was plaintiff's status as a passenger properly submitted to the jury by the instruction under the fourth question of the special verdict?

The case will stand for argument at the foot of the next assignment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Dibbert v. Metro. Inv. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • May 1, 1914
  • Spick v. State
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1909
  • Hobbs v. Ill. Cent. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1915
    ...880, 118 Am. St. Rep. 661, 9 Ann. Cas. 656;Hayes v. Chicago Tel. Co., 218 Ill. 414, 75 N. E. 1003, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 764;Ferguson v. Truax, 132 Wis. 478, 111 N. W. 657, 112 N. W. 513, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 350, 13 Ann. Cas. 1092;Muntz v. Railway Co., 116 La. 236, 40 South. 688;C., St. P., M.......
  • McCaffrey v. Auto. Liab. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • February 7, 1922
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT