Fern, Inc. v. Adjmi
Decision Date | 21 October 1993 |
Citation | 602 N.Y.S.2d 615,197 A.D.2d 444 |
Parties | FERN, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard ADJMI, Defendant-Appellant, and Harold Ebani, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before MURPHY, P.J., and CARRO, ROSS and ASCH, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered November 6, 1992, after a non-jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff as against defendant Adjmi in the sum of $38,488.37 and which dismissed the plaintiff's causes of action against defendants Ebani and Age Group, Ltd., unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The IAS court properly determined that plaintiff had established a cause of action for piercing the corporate veil so as to impose liability for the corporate rent obligations of Crayons upon defendant Adjmi.The record reveals that defendant Adjmi, who had negotiated and executed the lease agreement with the plaintiff on behalf of Crayons, exercised complete dominion and control over that corporate entity, which, as a mere alter ego of that defendant, had no assets, liabilities or income, no regularly elected...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Weinberg v. Picker
...603N.Y.S.2d 807, 623 N.E.2d 1157; CC Ming [USA] Ltd. Partnership v. Champagne Video, 232 A.D.2d 202, 648 N.Y.S.2d 21; Fern, Inc. v. Adjmi, 197 A.D.2d 444, 602 N.Y.S.2d 615). Ventresca Realty Corp. v. Houlihan, 28 A.D.3d 537, 538, 813 N.Y.S.2d 196, 197 (2006). Here, the allegations in the co......
-
Popowich v. Korman
...of America v. Cohen's Fashion Optical of 485 Lexington Ave. Inc., 45 A.D.3d 317, 318, 847 N.Y.S.2d 2 [2007]; Fern, Inc. v. Adjmi, 197 A.D.2d 444, 445, 602 N.Y.S.2d 615 [1993] ). It is also difficult to understand why the majority believes itself compelled to accept the framework that defend......
-
Austin Powder Co. v. McCullough
...the corporate veil as to McCullough (see, Walkovszky v. Carlton, 18 N.Y.2d 414, 276 N.Y.S.2d 585, 223 N.E.2d 6; Fern Inc. v. Adjmi, 197 A.D.2d 444, 602 N.Y.S.2d 615; 888 7th Ave. Assocs. Ltd. Partnership v. Arlen Corp., 172 A.D.2d 445, 569 N.Y.S.2d With respect to Anfo, it is clear from the......
-
Hudson Spring Partners, L.P. v. P & M Design Consultants, Inc.
...L.P. v. P+M Design Consultants, Inc., 112 A.D.3d 419, 420, 976 N.Y.S.2d 57 [1st Dept. 2013] ; see also Fern, Inc. v. Adjmi, 197 A.D.2d 444, 445, 602 N.Y.S.2d 615 [1st Dept. 1993] ). As a result, we found that plaintiff had stated a sufficient basis for piercing the corporate veil and imposi......