Ferradas v. State, 82-1352

Decision Date05 July 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1352,82-1352
Citation434 So.2d 24
PartiesLuis FERRADAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and William P. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The record contains competent evidence upon which a jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the sexual act between the victim and the defendant was nonconsensual. Further, the court's exclusion of evidence that the victim had successfully escaped an attempted gang assault two years earlier was not an abuse of discretion. See Nelson v. State, 395 So.2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980) (cross-examination must be shown to be relevant, and determination of relevancy is within the discretion of the trial court); Ray v. State, 262 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (trial court properly excluded immaterial matters from cross-examination).

Finally, the court properly allowed a physician from the Rape Treatment Center to testify, in response to a leading question, that the victim's injuries were consistent with forced sexual intercourse. See § 90.703, Fla.Stat. (1981) (testimony in form of opinion or inference is not objectionable because it includes an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact).

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • McLean v. State, 2D98-3582.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Abril 2000
    ...with the victim having forced sexual intercourse. See Bloodworth v. State, 504 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Ferradas v. State, 434 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). However, in this case, the prosecutor asked about the victim's actions and whether she acted in any way inconsistently with the w......
  • Fernander v. State, 82-2080
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Julio 1983
  • Bloodworth v. State, BL-333
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Marzo 1987
    ...the view that the trial court did not err in allowing this opinion testimony. See Section 90.703, Florida Statutes 1; Ferradas v. State, 434 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983) (opinion that rape victim's injuries were consistent with forced sexual intercourse properly admitted); Kruse v. State, 4......
  • Brown v. State, BQ-33
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 12 Abril 1988
    ...jury in a permissible manner by using the type of language illustrated in North v. State, 65 So.2d 77 (Fla.1952) and Ferradas v. State, 434 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), i.e., that the victim's symptoms were "consistent with" one who had been sexually We affirm the admission of Cooper's test......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT