Ferrando v. Casella

Decision Date28 April 1933
Citation165 A. 726
PartiesFERRANDO v. CASELLA et al.
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery

Syllabus by the Court.

An agreement to give a right of inheritance is enforceable.

On the facts proven, held, an agreement to give a foster child full rights of inheritance as though the natural, lawful issue of the foster mother will be enforced.

Suit by John A. Ferrando against Rose Casella and others.

Decree for complainant.

Mackay & Mackay, of Hackensack, for complainant.

Ziegener & Brenner, of Jersey City, for defendants Giovanni Battista Malatesta and Candida Malatesta, his wife.

LEWIS, Vice Chancellor.

Giudetta Ferrando died intestate in 1926 leaving her surviving two of the defendants, a sister Rose Casella and a brother Giovanni Battista Malatesta. Complainant John A. Ferrando, formerly John A. Casella and the legitimate child of defendant Rose Casella, claims the estate of his aunt, Giudetta Ferrando, by virtue of an agreement made between him and his aunt on January 29, 1918. This agreement made when complainant was twenty-six years of age provides that:

"The said party of the first part shall adopt the said John Casella, (also known as John Ferrando) the second party hereto, and shall for and during his natural life, board, lodge, clothe and generally maintain him in a manner suitable to his station, and as if he were the lawful son of the party of the first part, and to provide him with all necessaries.

"The said party of the first part hereby also covenant and agree that all rights, duties, privileges and relations between said party of the second part and herself, who shall be the mother by adoption of said party of the second part, may thenceforth in all respects be the same, including the right of inheritance, as if the said party of the second part had been born to herself, in lawful wedlock."

It clearly appears from the testimony that when complainant was a small boy his parents, Dominick and Rose Casella, allowed him to live with his aunt, Giudetta Ferrando, and her husband, Antonio Ferrando, and that he continued to live with them until Antonio died in 1918 and from then on he continued to live with Giudetta until her death. It is equally clear that the aunt and uncle treated complainant as their son and that complainant was known by the name of his foster parents.

It appears that there was never any formal legal adoption, since complainant's mother refused to consent thereto. This was necessary during the minority of complainant,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Burdick v. Grimshaw
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • 7 Septiembre 1933
    ...Olofsson, 105 N. J. Eq. 87, 147 A. 116; D. Girolamo v. DiMatteo, 108 N. J. Eq. 592, 156 A. 24; Ferrando v. Casella, 113 N. J. Eq. lit), 165 A. 726, 727. In each of those cases the agreement for the disposition of the property was coupled with a provision to adopt the recipient, and in each ......
  • Ferrando v. Casellas
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 12 Abril 1934
    ...171 A. 795 ... John A. FERRANDO, Respondent v. Rose CASELLA" et al., Appellants ... Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey ... April 12, 1934 ... 171 A. 795 ...         Appeal from Court of Chancery ...         Ziegener & Brenner, of Jersey City, for appellants ...         Mackay & Mackay, of Hackensack, for respondent ...  \xC2" ... ...
  • Braveman v. Munzer
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • 28 Abril 1933

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT