Feucht v. Triad Local Sch. Bd. of Educ.
Decision Date | 02 December 2019 |
Docket Number | Case No. 3:18-cv-345 |
Citation | Feucht v. Triad Local Sch. Bd. of Educ., 425 F.Supp.3d 914 (S.D. Ohio 2019) |
Parties | Wendy Pyfrin FEUCHT, Individually and as the Co-Administrator of the Estate of Bethany Thompson, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRIAD LOCAL SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio |
Donald J Kral, Columbus, OH, John J Reagan, Akron, OH 44333, Natasha Wells-Niklas, Kisling, Nestico & Redick, LLC, Akron, Oh, for Plaintiffs.
Cara Michelle Wright, Douglas Paul Holthus, Stacy Virginia Pollock, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., Columbus, OH, for Defendants.
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE REMAINING CLAIMS AND THEREFORE DISMISSING THE REMAINING CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN STATE COURT
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint(Doc. 17)(the "Motion"), filed by Defendants Triad Local Schools Board of Education(the "Board"), Duane Caudill("Caudill"), Christopher Piper("Piper"), and Jessica Gronas("Gronas")(collectively, the "Defendants"), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).PlaintiffsWendy Pyfrin Feucht and Paul Thompson(collectively, "Plaintiffs")1 filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion.(Doc. 25.)Defendants filed a Reply in support of the Motion.(Doc. 27.)The Motion is fully briefed and ripe for review.2(Docs. 17, 25, 27.)
For the reasons discussed below, the CourtGRANTS the Motion with respect to the federal law claims alleged in the Amended Complaint (i.e., Counts 1, 2, and 3).Those claims are dismissed.The Court also dismisses certain claims, as set forth below, that Plaintiffs conceded should be dismissed.Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' remaining state law and relief claims.Those claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court.In essence, the Court merely finds that the Amended Complaint does not state a facially plausible claim for relief under federal law.
This case involves the tragic death of 11-year old Bethany Thompson("Bethany"), who took her own life on October 19, 2016.To say that the circumstances alleged are disheartening is a considerable understatement.The remainder of this Background section consists of allegations taken from Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (the "Complaint")(Doc. 14); none of the allegations have been proven given that the case is still in the pleadings stage.
Plaintiffs, Wendy Pyfrin Feucht("Wendy") and Paul Thompson("Paul"), are Bethany's mother and father and the co-administrators of her estate.At all relevant times, Piper served as the Superintendent of Trial Local School District, Caudill served as the Principal at Triad Middle School, and Gronas served as the Guidance Counselor at Triad Middle School.Bethany and her parents tried to stop the bullying Bethany faced at school and repeatedly pleaded with certain defendants for help.Defendants failed to stop the bullying, and it continued.Consequently, Bethany suffered severe anguish, distress, and depression, and she ultimately committed suicide.On October 19, 2016, after years of pervasive bullying, harassment, assault and discrimination as a student in the Trial Local School District, Bethany, aged 11 and a sixth grader at Triad Middle School, killed herself with a gunshot to her head.
From a very early age, Bethany suffered from a visible, permanent deformity on the right side of her face.For many years, and particularly as a student at Triad Middle School, Bethany endured harassment and bullying at school at the hands of numerous students, some of whom are yet to be identified.It took the form of name-calling, verbal and physical harassment, sexual harassment, and physical pushing, shoving and elbowing in the school halls, during class, at recess, and on the bus.
Other Triad students also suffered unrelenting bullying and discrimination.In 2012, another Triad Middle School student committed suicide, although it is unknown whether bullying was a precipitating cause of that child's death.The 2012 suicide should have put the school district on high alert as to the psychological and emotional needs of its students and should have prompted the school to adopt a zero-tolerance policy regarding aggressive and harassing behavior.
On December 11, 2014(about two years before her death), Bethany wrote a letter to another student at recess stating that she was going to kill herself.Bethany's teacher reported the incident, per school rules, and also informed Bethany's mother.As a result of the suicidal statement, Bethany began receiving counseling at school.The Defendants knew or should have known of Bethany's 2014 suicidal threat.
On numerous occasions during the 2015-2016 school year and other years, Wendy informed the Defendants, including Principal Caudill and other school district employees, that Bethany was being harassed, bullied, and discriminated against.Each time the Defendants assured Wendy that they were aware of the issues and the situation was being handled.On March 21, 2016, in an email, Bethany told WitnessNo. 1 that MinorNo. 1 had shoved her when exiting the art room and that the next time she saw him (MinorNo. 1)she elbowed him and told him that she had enough.That same day, MinorNo. 1 snuck up on Bethany on the way to the bus and elbowed her.WitnessNo. 1 emailed Bethany the next day:
During the 2016-2017 school year, Bethany and WitnessNo. 1 were again subjected to severe and pervasive bullying, verbal harassment, and discrimination by MinorsNo. 1-5, including threats that they would tie the girls up and rape them.Such threats and harassment were specifically premised upon Bethany and WitnessNo. 1's gender.MinorsNo. 1-5 discriminated against, harassed, and bullied Bethany in part because she was female and had a disability.Upon information and belief, no more than a cursory investigation was conducted by the Defendants and little to no disciplinary action was ever imposed on the perpetrators of the bullying.Additionally, the Defendants knowingly placed Bethany in the same class with MinorNo. 1, who was the ringleader of the group of boys that incessantly bullied Bethany.
On September 8, 2016(about a month-and-a-half before her suicide), Bethany informed Principal Caudill that she was being harassed by MinorNo. 1, telling him that MinorNo. 1 is calling her names and intentionally trying to annoy her both in the classrooms and the hallways.The next day, Bethany's mother(Wendy), called Principal Caudill to inform him that MinorNo. 1 was harassing Bethany "again this year."During that conversation, Principal Caudill blamed Bethany for "instigating MinorNo. 1," but promised action and to keep Bethany safe.Plaintiffs relied upon the misrepresentations made by Defendants that the bullying was being addressed and that Bethany was safe.However, the Defendants failed to address the bullying, harassment, and discrimination.
The next day, Wendy sent multiple teachers an email regarding the issues that Bethany was having with MinorNo. 1 at school:
On September 12, 2016, a teacher responded to Wendy's email and indicated that she and others would continue to monitor the situation.
On or about September 14, 2016(a little over a month before her suicide), Bethany began expressing suicidal thoughts to WitnessNo. 1andWitnessNo. 3 and expressed that she thought that the bullying and harassment would never end.She told WitnessNo. 1 that if the school would not do something about the bullying then she would "handle the situation with a gun."That same day, WitnessNo. 1 informed her father, WitnessNo. 2, that Bethany was making suicidal threats and that Bethany said that she was "done with the bullies" and "wanted to kill herself with the gun from the closet."Upon learning this, WitnessNo. 2 called Principal Caudill and informed him that Bethany was threatening to kill herself and that both his daughter and Bethany were continually bullied at school.Principal...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Gillispie v. City of Miami Twp.
...had a policy or custom that caused the violation of his rights. Jackson, 925 F.3d at 828; see also Feucht v. Triad Local Schs. Bd. of Educ., 425 F. Supp. 3d 914, 932 (S.D. Ohio 2019) ("a municipal liability claim must adequately plead two elements: (1) that a constitutional violation occurr......
-
Chambers v. Sanders
... ... actions”); Feucht v. Triad Local Schools Bd. of ... Educ. , 425 ... ...
-
Morrison v. Mahoning Cnty.
... ... the challenged conduct.'” Feucht v. Triad Loc ... Sch. Bd. of Educ., 425 F.Supp.3d ... ...
-
Collik v. Pohlabel
...of Parma Heights, 437 F.3d 527, 533 (6th Cir. 2006) (citing West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988)); Feucht v. Triad Loc. Schs. Bd. of Educ., 425 F. Supp. 3d 914, 923 (S.D. Ohio 2019). "The Fourth Amendment protects 'the right of the people to be secure in their persons,houses, papers, and ......