Fewin v. City of Poplar Bluff

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtHOLSTEIN; CROW, P.J., and GREENE
CitationFewin v. City of Poplar Bluff, 768 S.W.2d 594 (Mo. App. 1989)
Decision Date13 March 1989
Docket NumberNo. 15602,15602
PartiesJohn R. FEWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, Ron Black and Vern Bechtel, Defendants-Respondents.

Application to Transfer Denied May 16, 1989.

Ted M. Henson, Jr., Poplar Bluff, for plaintiff-appellant.

Wallace L. Duncan, Poplar Bluff, for defendants-respondents.

HOLSTEIN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, John R. Fewin, appeals from the trial court's judgment denying him relief on his two-count petition against defendants, City of Poplar Bluff, its former mayor, Ron Black, and former city manager, Vern Bechtel.

Fewin's petition alleges that the defendants have prevented him, as owner of rental houses and vacant lots, from doing plumbing, electrical, and carpentry work on his own property, and defendants have refused to issue Fewin permits to construct houses and to remodel and repair existing houses. Fewin's petition alleges that the defendants' conduct is based on an ordinance enacted in 1971. In his first count Fewin seeks money damages. In the second count he seeks "an injunction prohibiting defendants from interfering with plaintiff's right to do plumbing work on his own property," and a mandatory injunction to require the city to issue all necessary permits.

The only ordinances before us and, as far as the record shows, before the trial court are those forbidding persons from engaging in the business or work of an electrician or engaging in the practice of plumbing without first having obtained a license to do so. According to city officials, the ordinances express a policy not to issue permits to perform electrical or plumbing work if the work is to be performed by an unlicensed person who does not own and reside on the property where the work is to be done. Fewin testified that he had never applied for a license to perform any electrical or plumbing work. He further testified that his last application for a building permit in December of 1984 had been granted by the city. There was no evidence that Fewin had ever been civilly or criminally prosecuted for performing electrical or plumbing work on any of his houses.

The ordinances before us only prohibit engaging in certain electrical and plumbing work without a license. They do not discuss the procedures for obtaining a license or permit. Presumably, there are ordinances establishing a procedure for...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Normandy School. v. Pasadena Hills
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 2002
    ...administrative act. Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Frontenac, 672 S.W.2d 147, 150 (Mo.App.1984); Fewin v. City of Poplar Bluff, 768 S.W.2d 594, 595 (Mo.App.1989). But this does not resolve our inquiry as to the appropriate City correctly asserts that if there is an adequate s......
2 books & journal articles
  • Section 71 Exhaustion
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Urban Development Subdivisions, and Annexations (2011 Ed.) Chapter 2 Zoning and Planning
    • Invalid date
    ...board of zoning appeals; the declaratory judgment law is not a substitute for already existing remedies); Fewin v. City of Poplar Bluff, 768 S.W.2d 594, 595 (Mo. App. S.D. 1989) (appeal dismissed because no showing that rental property owner had exhausted administrative remedies under the c......
  • Section 7.14 Provisions for Appeal
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Local Government Deskbook Chapter 7 Building and Housing Codes and Related Property Regulations
    • Invalid date
    ...Board of Building and Engineering Appeals as required by the municipal ordinance. Id. at 503–04. See also Fewin v. City of Poplar Bluff, 768 S.W.2d 594 (Mo. App. S.D. 1989); Quiktrip Corp. v. City of St. Louis, 801 S.W.2d 706 (Mo. App. E.D. 1990). When a decision of an administrative agency......