Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 610

Decision Date06 January 1964
Docket NumberNo. 610,610
Citation375 U.S. 963,84 S.Ct. 490,11 L.Ed.2d 413
PartiesFIBREBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS CORPORATION, petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Marion B. Plant and Gerard D. Reilly, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come, for the National Labor Relations Board.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:

'1. Was Petitioner required by the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing some of its employees about whether to let to an independent contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?

'3. Was the Board, in a case involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals formerly employed therein?'

The case is placed on the summary calendar.

Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Brown
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 29 March 1965
  • Gillespie v. United States Steel Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 7 December 1964
  • U.S. v. Polizzi
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 30 April 1974
    ... ... EMPRISE CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Defendant-Appellant ... 383 (1942). See also United States v. National Dairy Corp., 372 U.S. 29, 33, 35, 83 S.Ct. 594, 9 ... My People cut the articles out of the paper before they give me the paper. Before they bring ... at least by a majority of this three-man Board. I told you that we feel pretty good except that ... in the legislative history of the Fair Labor Standards Act that that Congress did not intend ... ...
  • General Foods Corp. v. Perk Foods Company, 64 C 1829.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 13 February 1968
    ... ... issued to plaintiff, General Foods Corporation (hereinafter known as General Foods) on January ... suit, and makes and sells various food products, including a rehydratable dry dog food called ... balanced dry dog food into the national market, under the name "Purina Dog Chow." Dog ... Minnesota & Ontario Paper, 261 U.S. 45, 46, 43 S.Ct. 322, 67 L.Ed. 523 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT