Fid. & Deposit Co. Of Baltimore v. Anderson

• Decision Date: 22 March 1897
• Citation: 102 Ga. 551,28 S.E. 382
• Court: Georgia Supreme Court
• Parties: FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF BALTIMORE et al. v. ANDERSON et al. ANDERSON et al. v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF BALTIMORE et al.

28 S.E. 382

102 Ga. 551

FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF BALTIMORE et al.

v.ANDERSON et al.

ANDERSON et al.

v.FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF BALTIMORE et al.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

March 22, 1897.

Appeal—Assignments of Error— Indefiniteness.

Where a cause involving both questions of law and fact is submitted, without the intervention of a jury, to the judge of a superior court, and the trial of the issue therein made results in a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and upon the writ of error to such judgment the only assignment of error is a general one, not specifying how or wherein the trial judge erred in his judgment, whether as to matter of law or as to matter of fact, such assignment of error is too general to be considered in this court, and upon motion the writ of error will be dismissed. Mayor, etc., v. Moore, 74 Ga. 409; Hall v. Huff, Id.; Association v. Glessner (decided last term) 27 S. E. 187.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from superior court, Bibb county; W. H. Felton, Jr., Judge.

Action by Anderson & Anderson against the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Baltimore and others. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants bring error, and plaintiffs file cross bill of exceptions. Dismissed.

Hoke Smith, H. C. Peeples, Bacon &...