Fid. Union Trust Co. v. Birch

Decision Date18 September 1936
Citation186 A. 816
PartiesFIDELITY UNION TRUST CO. v. BIRCH et al.
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery

Syllabus by the Court.

1. Testator directed payment of annuities for life, and on the death of annuitants, payment of certain legacies. Ileld, that the residue of the estate should be distributed, reserving, however, a sum sufficient to assure payment of annuities and future legacies.

Proceeding by the Fidelity Union Trust Company, as substituted trustee under the will of Thomas C. Barr, deceased, against Helen L. Birch and others.

Decree in accordance with opinion.

Hood, Lafferty & Campbell, of Newark, for complainant.

John M. Emery, of Hewark, for defendant adults.

J. Albert Homan and Ewald J. J. Smith, both of Trenton, for guardian ad litem.

BIGELOW, Vice Chancellor.

Complainant, as trustee under the will of Thomas C. Barr, deceased, asks the directions of the court. The will "has been before the court on two earlier occasions, Moore v. Downey, 83 N.J.Eq. 428, 91 A. 116, and Moore v. Dorey, 87 N.J.Eq. 325, 100 A. 207. The trustee has in hand a fund of about $800,000 with which to meet provisions of the will, in effect as follows :

To pay Katherine M. N. Payne $5,000 annually during her life.

On her death, leaving issue, to divide among them $100,000. Her issue are her daughter, Dorothy P. Goodspeed, and the latter's infant son, Dwight W. Goodspeed.

To pay Helen D. Lees $2,500 annually during her life.

On her death, leaving issue, $50,000 to her issue. Mrs. Lees has four children, George, Grace, Helen, and David, of whom the last three are infants.

The surplus income to "be divided equally and annually between my two sisters, Katherine V. Dorey and Helen L. Birch, during their natural lives." Mrs. Dorey died recently.

The residue and remainder to be divided as follows: To the representative of Mrs. Dorey and to Miss Birch, each one-third; to the representative of J. Nethermark Downey, deceased, to Mrs. Lees, and to Mrs. Payne, each one-ninth.

The remaindermen, save Mrs. Lees and the executor of Downey's will who have not answered, join with complainant in praying that the fund be presently distributed, reserving, however, $250,000 to answer annuities and the bequests to the issue of Mrs. Payne and Mrs. Lees. Mrs. Goodspeed consents; George Lees has not answered; the guardian ad litem for the infant contingent legatees opposes.

So much of the fund as is not required to assure payment of the annuities and future legacies may be now...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Kingston v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 25, 1941
    ... ... thereof. Harlow v. Weld, 42 R. I. 234, 104 A. 832; ... Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Birch, 121 N.J.Eq. 132, ... 186 A. 816. (12) The right to terminate a trust estate should ... not be denied merely because of an implication concerning ... ...
  • Central Home Trust Co., In re
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • April 14, 1960
    ...termination on the ground that the interests of the nonconsenting beneficiaries were not prejudiced thereby. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Birch, 121 N.J.Eq. 132, 186 A. 816 (Ch.1936); Scott, Trusts (2d ed. 1956) § 340.2 at p. 2502. To same effect see Restatement (Second) Trusts § 338(2) The ......
  • Van Orman v. American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • March 26, 1984
    ...out a material purpose of the trust). Restatement of Trusts 2d, §§ 337, 340; Scott on Trusts, Sec. 337; Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Birch, 121 N.J.Eq. 132, 186 A. 816 (Ch.1936). However, there are substantial differences between trusts established by individuals, either inter vivos or by wi......
  • Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Berenblum
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • March 6, 1964
    ...one-third of principal can be paid out immediately. Partial termination of a trust has been approved. Fidelity Union Trust Company v. Birch, 121 N.J.Eq. 132, 186 A. 816 (Ch.1936). In that case, however, the testator had specified that the should pay annuities of $7,500 and eventually pay ce......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT