Fidelity Bank v. Lutheran Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Decision Date22 September 1972
Docket NumberNo. 72-1024.,72-1024.
Citation465 F.2d 211
PartiesFIDELITY BANK, a National Association (formerly Fidelity National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma), a national banking corporation, Defendant-Appellant, v. LUTHERAN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Ted D. Foster, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellant.

Houston Bus Hill, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BREITENSTEIN, HILL, and DOYLE, Circuit Judges.

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee Lutheran Mutual Life Insurance Company brought this diversity action against defendant-appellant Fidelity Bank of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to recover on a letter of credit issued by Bank. The trial court gave summary judgment for Lutheran and Bank appeals.

Four Seasons Equity Corporation and a related company, neither of which are parties to this action, constructed and operated nursing homes. In December, 1969, Four Seasons considered the purchase of property in the Town of Caledonia, Racine County, Wisconsin, for the site of a nursing home. A rezoning problem developed and the site was abandoned. In January, 1970, Four Seasons selected and offered to purchase another site, this in the Town of Mt. Pleasant, Racine County, Wisconsin. The property was rezoned and Four Seasons purchased the site in March, 1970.

Four Seasons then negotiated with Northland Mortgage Company for financing to construct the nursing home. Northland, which is not a party to this action, secured a loan commitment from Lutheran on March 18 in the amount of $525,000 to finance construction. The property was designated as located at Racine, Wisconsin, with the exact legal description to be furnished later. The commitment contained this condition:

"Stand-by deposit of $10,500. This amount can be either a cash deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit. We reserve the right to approve the form and the banking institution. Said deposit to be returned when the loan is completed, but if the loan is not completed by the borrower according to the terms of the commitment, said deposit shall be retained as liquidated damages."

On March 31, Bank issued an irrevocable letter of credit to Northland in the amount of $10,500. It is stated therein that:

"This letter of credit is given for the benefit of the Four Seasons Equity Corporation to serve as a standby deposit of $10,500.00 to guarantee their consummation of a loan of $525,000.00 on real property described as follows: here follows a description of property "in the Town of Caledonia, Racine County, Wisconsin"."

Northland assigned the letter of credit to Lutheran. Later in 1970, bankruptcy proceedings were brought against Four Seasons. The loan was never completed. On October 15, Lutheran by letter to Bank demanded payment of the $10,500 and enclosed the release required by the letter of credit. Bank refused payment, apparently on the ground that the misdescription absolved it of liability.

In connection with the opposing motions for summary judgment, there were submitted the loan commitment, the letter of credit, various letters with their enclosures, two affidavits and a deposition of a vice-president of Bank, three affidavits with various attachments sworn to by employees of Four Seasons, and one affidavit of a Northland employee. Bank moved to strike portions of the affidavits of Brown and Major which were submitted by Lutheran. Error is asserted in the action of the court in granting summary judgment for Lutheran without ruling on the motion to strike. We find nothing in the attacked portions of the affidavits which is material or relevant to the disposition of the issues and we assume that the trial court ignored such portions just as we do. Orderly procedure would have been to dispose of the motion to strike before granting summary judgment, but failure to do so does not affect the validity of the summary judgment.

The record does not show how or why the misdescription got into the letter of credit. Where the fault may lie, it is with either Four Seasons or Bank, not with either Northland or Lutheran. As the case is presented to us there is no dispute that Lutheran made a loan commitment to Four Seasons to cover a business property at Racine, Wisconsin; that no legal description was given of that property; that the site was in Mt. Pleasant, Racine County, and not in Caledonia, Racine County; that Caledonia and Mt. Pleasant are suburbs of Racine; that Bank issued the letter of credit containing the description of the Caledonia property; that the loan was not completed because of the failure of Four Seasons to comply with the conditions of the loan commitment; that Lutheran demanded payment under the letter of credit and supplied to Bank the necessary papers; and that Bank refused payment.

The letter of credit comes within the definition of that term in the Oklahoma version of the Uniform Commercial Code. See 12A O.S.A. §§ 5-102, 5-103. A letter of credit provides a method of payment through banking channels and defines the terms and conditions upon which payment will be made. Venizelos, S.A. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 2 Cir., 425 F.2d 461, 464. It is a primary obligation between the issuer and the beneficiary. Asociacion de Azucareros de Guatemala v. United States National Bank of Oregon, 9 Cir., 423 F.2d 638, 641. The letter of credit with which we are concerned was assignable because drafts drawn under it were negotiable. See 12A O.S.A. § 5-116, and Decker Steel Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago, 7 Cir., 330 F.2d 82, 83. Indeed, Bank does not question assignability.

Bank issued the letter of credit as a service for a depositor, Four Seasons, and relied on the net worth of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Gulf Oil Corp. v. F. P. C.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • September 7, 1977
    ...part of the contract, must give way in case of conflict with the operative provisions of a contract. Fidelity Bank v. Lutheran Mutual Life Ins. Co., 465 F.2d 211, 214 (10th Cir. 1972); Kogod v. Stanley Co. of America, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 114, 186 F.2d 763, 765 (1950). Thus, although we per......
  • Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. TCF Nat'l Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • June 20, 2012
    ...Bank v. Equibank, 394 F.Supp. 352 (W.D.Pa.1975), vacated on other grounds,550 F.2d 882 (3rd Cir.1977); Fidelity Bank v. Lutheran Mutual Life Insurance Co., 465 F.2d 211 (10th Cir.1972); Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 419 F.Supp. 734 (D.Minn.19......
  • First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp., 76571
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • March 14, 1995
    ...Arbest Constr. Co. v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, 777 F.2d 581 (10th Cir.1985); Fidelity Bank v. Lutheran Mut. Life Ins. Co., 465 F.2d 211 (10th Cir.1972); Bank of Montreal v. Federal Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee, 622 F.Supp. 6 (W.D.Okla.1984); West Virginia Hous. De......
  • Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. TCF Nat'l Bank, 10 C 6142
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • June 20, 2012
    ...F. Supp. 352 (W.D. Pa. 1975), vacated on other grounds, 550 F.2d 882 (3rd Cir. 1977); Fidelity Bank v. Lutheran Mutual Life Insurance Co., 465 F.2d 211 (10th Cir. 1972); Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 419 F. Supp. 734 (D. Minn. 1976); Brummer ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT