Fidelity Trust Co. v. American Surety Co.

Decision Date11 December 1909
Docket Number50.
Citation175 F. 200
PartiesFIDELITY TRUST CO. v. AMERICAN SURETY CO. et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

John Marshall Gest and John G. Johnson, for plaintiff.

James H. Westcott and W. W. Smithers, for American Surety Co.

J. B McPHERSON, District Judge.

This controversy arises upon the following undisputed facts Richard Smith of the city of Philadelphia died in September 1894, leaving a will by which he provided inter alia for the erection of an elaborate and costly structure in Fairmount Park. He spoke of this structure as 'a monumental memorial,' and directed the plaintiff to erect it as trustee under the will, specifying that

'The said memorial is to include equestrian statues in bronze of Major-Generals George B. McClellan and Winfield S. Hancock and colossal statues in bronze of Major-Generals George G Meade and John F. Reynolds; the niches in the right and left wings of the design to have pedestals to receive bronze busts of the following distinguished Pennsylvanians, namely; Governor Andrew G. Curtin, Major-General John F. Hartranft, Admirals David D. Porter and John A. Dahlgren, General James A. Beaver, Major-General S.W. Crawford, and in addition thereto the architect, James H. Windrim, and my executor, John B. Gest. A mural tablet in bronze will be placed upon the pedestal stage of one of the main columns with the inscription 'This Monumental Arch presented by Richard Smith, Type Founder, of Philadelphia, In memory of Pennsylvanians who took part in the Civil War, whose strife was not for aggrandizement, but when conflict ceased, the North with the South united, again to enjoy the common heritage left by the Fathers of our Country, resolving that thereafter all our people should dwell together in unity.'

'Upon the pedestal stage of the other main column will be placed upon a bracketed rest, on the right of the entrance front, a statue of myself, in bronze, and underneath, the name of Richard Smith, in large letters. The central part of said memorial to be for a carriage way, and on either side passages for pedestrians. And I direct that the entire expense of the memorial and the erection and completion thereof shall not exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).'

In the course of carrying out the testator's instructions, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with Paul W. Bartlett, a sculptor, on November 2, 1898, by which Bartlett agreed:

'That he will himself design, model and sculpture, to the best of his art and skill, an equestrian statue of the late Major-General George B. McClellan, and complete the same in bronze set in place as a part of the monumental Memorial to be erected in West Fairmount Park, Philadelphia, under the provisions of the will of the late Richard Smith, within two years from the date of September 1, 1898.'

The agreement then went on to provide:

'The total height of the horse and rider shall be one hundred and eighty inches, more or less, above the bronze plinth or base upon which the statuary rests, the sizes of the horse and rider to be in proportion thereto.
'The model shall be subject to the approval of the party of the first part, or its authorized agent. After the model has been approved by the party of the first part, or its authorized agent, the same shall be cast in bronze of the formula ninety per cent. pure copper, seven per cent. pure tin, and three per cent. zinc or spelter the section of the metal in the casting to be in no place less than one quarter of an inch in thickness; the casting to be done by a reputable bronze foundry, executed and finished in the most artistic and workmanlike manner.
'The party of the first part, or its authorized agent, shall have the right to test the bronze used in said castings, and reject the same if found not in accordance with the formula stipulated in this contract; and, for the purpose of making tests, coupons shall be cast upon each piece of casting to be removed by the representative of the party of the first part for such tests.
'The castings shall be inspected and approved at the foundry by the authorized agent of the party of the first part before acceptance.
'The plinth or base upon which the statue rests, shall have a concealed gutter cast to receive all drippings from storm water, and connection provided to a conductor furnished under another contract. There shall also be constructed in the plinth or base in a suitable position, and according to working drawings provided by the party of the first part, a trapdoor and frame for access to the statue from the core wells provided in the contract for granite work.
'The statue shall be attached to the granite work with proper bolts, clamps, etc., of bronze, in the best style of art, and to the entire satisfaction of the authorized agent of the party of the part.
'Second. The party of the second part hereby agrees to submit at his studio to the party of the first part, or its authorized agent for approval, one or more sketch models in clay, wax or plaster, of the statuary he is to execute, at a scale of two and a half inches to one foot, prior to the commencement of any work upon the enlarged model; if the party of the second part fails to make this model acceptable to the party of the first part, then this contract is void, and ceases to be obligatory on the party of the first part, or upon the party of the second part; if said sketch model is approved, the party of the second part further agrees to make a duplicate thereof in plaster and deposit the same with the said trustee; but it is distinctly understood that said duplicate is not to be published, and is to remain the property of the party of the second part; and the said party of the second part further agrees to furnish and set in position, a full sized model in staff or cement of the subject from an approved sketch, upon a temporary full sized model of the Monumental Memorial to be erected in staff in said park, under a contract with other parties.
'The said party of the second part agrees after the full sized model has been set in position on the staff structure, to make such modifications in dimensions or design as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto.
'Third. The party of the second part also covenants and agrees that according to the provisions of this agreement he will proceed without delay to prepare the sketch model, the model for the staff structure, and the finished model, and cast the equestrian statue; that he will insure said model and statue in an insurance company satisfactory to the party of the first part, until the said statue in bronze shall be completed, and set in place, and in an amount to be increased from time to time, according to the payments made herein and equal to the total amount thereof, pay the premium of insurance thereon, and assign and deliver the policy of insurance to the party of the first part; that he will ship said statue at his own expense to the city of Philadelphia, in a proper manner to prevent injury in transportation, and that he will set it up on the said Monumental Memorial in the city of Philadelphia, in the position thereon designated, in conformity with the provisions of this contract; and that upon the completion of said statue, the same shall, upon being accepted by the party of the first part, be free from all incumbrances.
'It is hereby specifically covenanted and agreed that no lien shall be filed against said statuary or Monumental Memorial, by either the contractor or subcontractor, or other person or persons.
'Fourth. It is further covenanted and agreed by and between the said parties of the first and second parts, respectively, that no change of any kind or character whatever shall be made in the design of the sketch model as approved, unless such change be agreed to in writing, and signed by the parties hereto, respectively; and the party of the second part shall make no claim of any kind or character whatsoever for any extra compensation of said equestrian statue, either for services rendered or materials furnished.
'Fifth. And it is further agreed by and between the said parties of the first and second parts that the said party of the second part shall promptly and without delay prosecute the work to be done by him under this contract, with all diligence, to insure the completion thereof within the time limit of this contract; that if he should fail to commence the said works promptly, as herein provided, or shall fail, in the judgment of the party of the first part, with reasonable diligence to prosecute the same as herein provided, then, and in either case, the said party of the first part shall have the power to annul this contract by giving notice in writing to the party of the second part, or his legal representatives; and upon the giving of such notice, all moneys unpaid on account of this contract shall be and become forfeited to the said trustee (party of the first part) and the party of the first part shall thereupon be authorized to proceed to provide for the completion of said sculpture and statuary, wholly free and discharged from any and all obligations to the party of the second part in respect to the matters and works mentioned in this contract, with the right of party of the first part to compensation from the party of the second part for such damages as may result from his failure to faithfully keep and perform this agreement.
'Sixth. The said party of the second part shall give to the party of the first part the written bond of a surety company satisfactory to the party of the first part, for the faithful performance by him of the terms of this agreement (said bond to be increased from time to time, according to the payments made
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Consolidated School Dist. No. 4 of Texas County v. Citizens' Sav. Bank of Cabool
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 26, 1929
    ...its written terms and conditions. 9 C. J., 39, 40, 46; 4 R. C. L. 56, 57; Insurance Co. v. McDearman, 133 Mo.App. 671; Fidelity Trust Co. v. Surety Co., 175 F. 200; 41 C. J. 466; Commission Co. v. Spencer, 236 Mo. 608; Sparks v. Bank, 3 Del. Ct. 274; Inman v. Nolan, 288 S.W. 1007; Home Savi......
  • Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. State Tax Commission of Md.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • February 23, 1955
    ...32 A.2d 507; United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 236 U.S. 512, 35 S.Ct. 298, 59 L.Ed. 696; Fidelity Trust Co. v. American Surety Co., C.C., 175 F. 200, affirmed 3 Cir., 179 F. 699; New Era Homes Corp. v. Forster, 299 N.Y. 303, 86 N.E.2d 757, 22 A.L.R.2d 1338; and see ann......
  • Stix, Baer & Fuller Dry Goods Company v. Ottawa Realty Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1918
    ... ... OTTAWA REALTY COMPANY et al.; CHICAGO BONDING & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri, Second Division February ... 298; Stevens v. Partridge, ... 109 Ill.App. 486; Trust Co. v. Surety Co., 175 F ... 200. (c) Where a contract of sale is ... ...
  • American Surety Co. of New York v. Fidelity Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • June 15, 1910

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT