Fidelity Trust Co. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.

Decision Date27 June 1906
Docket Number54
Citation64 A. 829,215 Pa. 610
PartiesFidelity Trust Company v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Appellant
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued March 27, 1906

Appeal, No. 54, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from decree of C.P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., June Term, 1905, No. 3,344, on bill in equity in case of Fidelity Trust Company, Trustee, et al., v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. Affirmed.

Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Ralston, J.

The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Error assigned was the decree of the court.

The assignments of error are overruled, the appeal is dismissed and the decree of the court below is affirmed.

John G Johnson, for appellant. -- The preferred stock is not cumulative: Elkins v. Camden & Atlantic R.R. Co., 36 N.J. Eq. 233.

If it be cumulative, there is no right on the part of the holders of the preferred shares to deny payment of dividends on common shares, excepting to such extent as said holders prior to June, 1904, had not received dividends at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the time of original issuance thereof: Wright v. Hanna, 210 Pa. 349.

H. Gordon McCouch and Samuel Dickson, with them Henry S. Drinker, Jr., Stacy B. Lloyd, G. Heide Norris and Crawford & Loughlin, for appellees. -- The terms of the contract contained in the Act of March 4, 1850, P.L. 129, make the dividends on the preferred stock cumulative: Henry v. Ry. Co., 1 DeG. & J. 606; Webb v. Earle, L.R. 20 Eq. 556; Crawford v. Ry. Co., 3 Jur. N.S. 1093; Corry v. Ry. Co., 29 Beav. 263; Allen v. Ry. Co., 25 W.R. 524; Matthews v. Ry. Co., 5 Jur. N.S. 284; Prouty v. R.R. Co., 1 Hun, 655; Boardman v. Lake Shore, etc., Ry. Co., 84 N.Y. 157; Elkins v. Camden, etc., R.R. Co., 36 N.J. Eq. 233; West Chester, etc., R.R. Co. v. Jackson, 77 Pa. 321.

The appellees are entitled to their arrears without any deduction for past overpayments: Chicago, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ry. Co., 101 Fed. Repr. 792.

Before MITCHELL, C.J., FELL, POTTER, ELKIN and STEWART, JJ.

OPINION

MR. JUSTICE POTTER:

The facts of this case were not in dispute, and are clearly and accurately stated by the learned trial judge, as follows: "The original complainants in this case, and others who have intervened, are owners of shares of preferred stock of the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, respondent.

"Under the terms of an act passed by the legislature of Pennsylvania, approved March 4, 1850, P.L. 129, the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company was authorized to issue preferred stock which was entitled to a preference over all other stock of said company in every future dividend of profits declared, until the holders were paid from the funds applicable to the payment of such dividend, ten per cent. per annum. It was further enacted that the holders of all the other stock of the company should not be entitled to participate in any future dividend of the profits of the company until the holders of preferred stock had been first paid from the funds applicable to such dividend ten per cent. per annum.

"On June 18, 1864, an agreement was entered into between the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company and the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, under the provisions of the Act of May 16, 1861, P.L. 702, relating to the merger of railroad corporations, by which a merger of the two corporations was effected.

"By this agreement the property of the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company was transferred to and vested in the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. It was agreed that the holders of preferred stock of the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company should be entitled to preferred stock to be issued by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, securing the same rights and privileges with respect thereto as were held and enjoyed by them in the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company.

"Dividends upon the preferred stock were paid at the rate of ten per cent. until October 17, 1893. In addition thereto, on January 2, 1860, an extra dividend of ten per cent. on the preferred stock, as well as upon the common, of the Beaver Meadow Railroad & Coal Company was paid in shares of common stock, except where such dividends amounted to a fractional part of a share, when the payment was made in cash at the rate of $50.00 per share.

"In 1861 a regular dividend of ten per cent. was paid on both common and preferred stock. In 1862 ten per cent. was paid on preferred stock, but only eight per cent. was paid on common stock.

"On January 2, 1863, an extra dividend of ten per cent. was declared and paid in stock, and on January 2, 1866, a dividend of ten per cent. of the same character was paid by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. The regular dividend of ten per cent. was paid each year upon the preferred stock until 1893. In 1876 nine per cent. only was paid to the common stockholders, and during the years from 1877 to 1893 the annual dividend upon the common stock was from six to eight per cent. No dividends were declared on either the preferred or common stock from October 17, 1893, until June 20, 1904, when a dividend of ten per cent. was declared on the preferred stock, payable August 1, 1904, and a dividend of one per cent. on the common stock.

"A bill in equity was filed by the holders of the preferred stock, praying for a decree declaring them entitled to cumulative dividends at the rate of ten per cent. per annum before the payment of any dividends to the holders of common stock; for an order directing the specific performance of the agreement of merger between the corporations, and for an injunction enjoining the payment of dividends to holders of common stock until the preferred stockholders had been paid at the rate of ten per cent. per annum from October, 1893.

"An answer and replication were filed and testimony taken in support of the allegations contained in the bill and in the answer which was amended at the hearing."

Under these facts two questions arose which are thus stated by appellant:

"Whether the holders of preferred shares were entitled cumulatively, to dividends at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the time of issuance thereof, before the holders of common shares were entitled to any dividends.

"Whether, if thus entitled, their right was to an amount in excess of ten per centum per annum from the date of original issuance of shares, there having been paid to them, in some years, dividends in excess of ten per centum per annum."

The court below decided both these questions adversely to the defendant company, and finally decreed "That by virtue of the provisions of the Act of Assembly of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, March 4, 1850, P.L. 129, and the execution of the articles of merger between the Beaver Meadow Railroad and Coal Company dated June 18, 1864, and the issue of the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company of its preferred stock thereunder, the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company specifically contracted that the holders thereof should be entitled to cumulative dividends thereon at the rate of ten per cent. per annum before the payment of any dividend to the holders of its common stock.

"The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company is hereby perpetually enjoined from making any payments of dividends to the holders of its common stock until it shall have paid the holders of its preferred stock, dividends at the rate of ten per cent. per annum from October 17, 1893.

"Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the complainants against the defendant for the sum of $91,338.85, being ten per cent. per annum from October 17, 1893, to August 1, 1903, on 1,714 shares of preferred stock of the par value of $83,892 with interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum from August 1, 1904; the various complainants being entitled to the proportion of said sum which the number of shares held by him, her or it bears to the whole 1,714 shares held by them in the aggregate."

From this decree defendant has appealed.

As to the first question, whether or not the dividends upon the preferred stock are under the contract cumulative, we feel that sound reason, and the weight of authority, both English and American, are in accordance with the conclusion reached by the court below.

The act of ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT