Field v. Drew Theological Seminary
Decision Date | 10 February 1890 |
Citation | 41 F. 371 |
Parties | FIELD et al. v. DREW THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Delaware |
Syllabus by the Court
A condition, in a bequest for educating two young men for the ministry, that they shall, after entering it, pursue a certain course, that was not optional with the minister, but subject to the control of the bishop, is a condition subsequent, and does not affect the validity of the gift.
A charitable bequest to a corporation not in existence at testator's death, but to be thereafter created by act of legislature in accordance with his will, is valid.
A bequest providing for the creation of a fund for the education of 'two young men, for all coming time,' for the Christian ministry, is a valid charitable use.
A bequest, in trust, of a 'sum of money sufficient to carry out (testator's) intention' 'to provide for the education of two young men, * * * ' where the trustees have accepted the trust, and young men have been appointed and the expense of keeping them approximately known, is not void for indefiniteness.
Bates & Harrington, for complainants.
Hoffecker & Hoffecker and Talmage W. Foster, for respondents.
This suit is an amicable one, on bill, answer, and admitted facts. The complainants, after stating that they have been advised that some doubt exists as to the validity of a certain bequest contained in the will of their testator, and making the same a part of their bill, apply to the court for directions touching their duty in the premises, that they may be directed in what manner to proceed in order faithfully to execute the provisions of the will, and that the true construction thereof may be declared.
James Riddle, the testator, died August 21, 1873; and his will was duly probated, on the 20th day of October, in the same year. The bequest in question is in these words:
In a subsequent part of the will the testator gives instructions to his executors, in relation to this bequest, as follows:
* * * '
Letters testamentary were granted to Hannah Riddle, William M. Field and Leander F. Riddle, the executors named in the will. The executors have paid all the debts of the testator, and there remain sufficient and ample funds in their hands to pay and discharge the legacy bequeathed in the twenty-first item. The Drew Theological Seminary, founded in 1866, and incorporated under the laws of the state of New Jersey in 1868, has since then been maintained, and is now in operation, at Madison, as an institution for the education of young men for the ministry of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and for service as missionaries to foreign countries. In 1875, an act was passed by the legislature of Delaware entitled 'An act to incorporate trustees to carry out certain provisions of the last will and testament of James Riddle, deceased. ' By this act, Leander F. Riddle, William M. Field, and Hannah Riddle, and their successors to be selected as therein provided, are authorized to receive 'all sums of money devised by James Riddle, deceased, for religious purposes, objects of charity, and educational purposes, in all cases where such legacies are made to be perpetual, and pay over to the person or persons duly authorized to receive the same, in such sum, and at such times, as the same is directed to be paid, under and by virtue of the last will and testament of James Riddle,' etc. Between the years 1874 and 1880, the executors, in pursuance of the provisions of the will, paid to the trustees of the seminary $2,760, to provide for the education of certain young men who had been duly appointed by the said William M. Field and Leander F. Riddle; and the said moneys were duly applied for the education of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Buchanan v. Kennard
... ... 547; Drury v ... Natick, 10 Allen, 180; Field v. Theological ... Seminary, 41 F. 371; Powers v. Powers, 29 ... 182; Straw v. East Maine ... Conference, 67 Me. 493; Drew v. Wakefield, 54 ... Me. 291; Moore v. Alden, 80 Me. 301; Dane v. Home ... ...
-
Catron v. Scarritt Collegiate Institute
...of such a use. 2 Pom. Eq. Jur., sec. 987; 1 Perry, Trusts, sec. 384; Doyle v. Whalen, 87 Me. 414; Ireland v. Geraghty, 15 F. 35; Field v. Seminary, 41 F. 371; Heuser Harris, 42 Ill. 425; Morgan v. Seminary, 70 Ill.App. 575; Webber v. Bryant, 161 Mass. 400; Hathaway v. Sackett, 32 Mich. 97; ......
-
Harrold v. First Nat. Bank of Fort Worth
...Ill. 182, 162 N.E. 888; Gallaher v. Gallaher, 106 W.Va. 588, 146 S.E. 623; Hoyt v. Bliss, 93 Conn. 344, 105 A. 699; Field v. Drew Theological Seminary, C.C., 41 F. 371; Barnard v. Adams, C.C., 58 F. 17 Morse v. First National Bank, Tex. Civ.App., 194 S.W.2d 578. ...
-
Dykeman v. Jenkines
... ... Habersham (1882), 107 U.S ... 174, 2 S.Ct. 336, 27 L.Ed. 401; Field v. Drew ... Theological Seminary (1890), 41 F. 371; Manners ... v ... ...