Field v. Kearns

CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
CitationField v. Kearns, 684 A.2d 711, 239 Conn. 942 (Conn. 1996)
Decision Date07 November 1996
PartiesArthur FIELD v. James M. KEARNS.

Michael W. Lyons, Norwalk, in support of the petition.

Julie A. Harris, Glastonbury, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn.App. 265, 682 A.2d 148 (AC 14689), is denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
53 cases
  • Lafferty v. Jones
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 23, 2020
    ...(Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Field v. Kearns , 43 Conn. App. 265, 275–76, 682 A.2d 148, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942, 684 A.2d 711 (1996).5 General Statutes § 52-196a provides in relevant part: "(b) In any civil action in which a party files a complaint, counterclaim......
  • Iacurci v. Sax
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 2012
    ...exist.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn.App. 265, 270, 682 A.2d 148, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942, 684 A.2d 711 (1996); see also McColl v. Pataky, 160 Conn. 457, 459, 280 A.2d 146 (1971).IIIANALYSIS On the basis of the law of summary judgment, and......
  • Village Mortgage Co. v. Veneziano
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • January 25, 2016
    ...[ Petyan v. Ellis, 200 Conn. 243, 510 A.2d 1337 (1986)]." Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn.App. 265, 271, 682 A.2d 148, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942, 684 A.2d 711 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Rioux v. Barry, Conn. 338, 927 A.2d 304 (2007) (overruling the grant of absolute privilege in a vex......
  • Village Mortgage Co. v. Veneziano
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • December 23, 2015
    ...[ Petyan v. Ellis, 200 Conn. 243, 510 A.2d 1337 (1986)]." Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn.App. 265, 271, 682 A.2d 148, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942, 684 A.2d 711 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Rioux v. Barry, Conn. 338, 927 A.2d 304 (2007) (overruling the grant of absolute privilege in a vex......
  • Get Started for Free