Fieldman v. Brannon

Docket Number19-1795
Decision Date12 August 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Lucio v. Lumpkin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 9, 2021
    ...them. See also supra at 479–80 n.10.D.Finally, the dissenters point to Scrimo v. Lee , 935 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2019), and Fieldman v. Brannon , 969 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2020). See post , at 514–15 (Haynes, J., dissenting). Neither helps the dissenters. Scrimo held that a state court violates AE......
  • Hinkle v. Neal
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • October 13, 2022
    ...engage with, much less defer to, the analyses of the Indiana courts.The dissent also overreads this court's decision in Fieldman v. Brannon , 969 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2020), as "voic[ing] skepticism about whether the Kubsch factors should apply in complete-defense cases when the excluded ev......
  • Kuchinskas v. Winkelski, Case No. 16-cv-1054-pp
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • November 23, 2020
    ...defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to a "meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense." Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 800 (7th Cir. 2020). "It's well established, however, that the constitutional rights to cross-examine witnesses and present relevant testimony are......
  • Kuchinskas v. Winkelski
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • September 29, 2020
    ...defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to a "meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense." Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 800 (7th Cir. 2020). "It's well established, however, that the constitutional rights to cross-examine witnesses and present relevant testimony are......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Review Proceedings
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-Annual Review, August 2022
    • August 1, 2022
    ...2015) (claim of error cognizable because trial court’s error prejudiced defendant by violating Confrontation Clause); Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 806, 810 (7th Cir. 2020) (claim of error cognizable because state court’s exclusion of defendant’s testimony violated due process); Kipp v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT