Fieldman v. Brannon
Docket Number | 19-1795 |
Decision Date | 12 August 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Lucio v. Lumpkin
...them. See also supra at 479–80 n.10.D.Finally, the dissenters point to Scrimo v. Lee , 935 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 2019), and Fieldman v. Brannon , 969 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2020). See post , at 514–15 (Haynes, J., dissenting). Neither helps the dissenters. Scrimo held that a state court violates AE......
-
Hinkle v. Neal
...engage with, much less defer to, the analyses of the Indiana courts.The dissent also overreads this court's decision in Fieldman v. Brannon , 969 F.3d 792 (7th Cir. 2020), as "voic[ing] skepticism about whether the Kubsch factors should apply in complete-defense cases when the excluded ev......
-
Kuchinskas v. Winkelski, Case No. 16-cv-1054-pp
...defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to a "meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense." Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 800 (7th Cir. 2020). "It's well established, however, that the constitutional rights to cross-examine witnesses and present relevant testimony are......
-
Kuchinskas v. Winkelski
...defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to a "meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense." Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 800 (7th Cir. 2020). "It's well established, however, that the constitutional rights to cross-examine witnesses and present relevant testimony are......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Review Proceedings
...2015) (claim of error cognizable because trial court’s error prejudiced defendant by violating Confrontation Clause); Fieldman v. Brannon, 969 F.3d 792, 806, 810 (7th Cir. 2020) (claim of error cognizable because state court’s exclusion of defendant’s testimony violated due process); Kipp v......