Fields v. Henderson

Decision Date17 June 1909
PartiesFIELDS ET AL. v. HENDERSON.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Walker County; T. L. Sowell, Judge.

Suit by J. W. Henderson against A. E. Fields and others to set aside a judgment. Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal. Reversed and rendered.

M. L. Ward, for appellants.

W. L. Chenault and D. A. McGregor, for appellee.

ANDERSON, J.

A court of equity will cancel a judgment at law when the complainant avers and proves that he had no notice of the suit and has a meritorious defense to same. McDonald v. Cawhorn, 152 Ala. 357, 44 So. 395; Dunklin v. Wilson, 64 Ala. 162; Rice v. Tobias, 89 Ala. 214, 7 So. 765. In the case at bar, while there may be some little doubt as to whether or not the complainant had notice of the suit, we think the evidence fails to show that he had a meritorious defense to same.

The undisputed evidence shows that complainant bought cattle from the respondent Fields. Both of the Fieldses testify that he gave a note for the purchase price of same. Ward testified that said note was turned over to him for collection, and that he got judgment upon same in justice court, and subsequently sued upon said judgment in the circuit court, where the judgment in question was rendered. The complainant admitted contracting a debt for the cattle, but claims that he gave no note for same and that said debt has been paid. We think the weight of evidence shows that complainant is mistaken in this, and that the note was given and was never paid. The amount of the note, with attorney's fees, interest, and the cost in justice court, can very well correspond with the sum for which the judgment in the circuit court was subsequently rendered.

The judge of the law and equity court erred in granting the relief sought, and the deree is reversed, and one is here rendered dismissing the bill of complaint.

Reversed and rendered.

DOWDELL, C.J., and McCLELLAN and MAYFIELD, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Prudential Cas. Co. v. Kerr
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1918
    ... ... Hinson, ... 103 Ala. 532, 537, 15 So. 844; Rice v. Tobias, 89 ... Ala. 214, 7 So. 765; McDonald v. Cawhorn, 152 Ala ... 357, 44 So. 395; Fields v. Henderson, 161 Ala. 534, ... 50 So. 56; Raisin Fert. Co. v. McKenna, 114 Ala ... 274, 21 So. 816; Gill v. Moore, 76 So. 458; ... Dunklin v ... ...
  • Gray v. Handy
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1920
    ... ... v. Hinson, 103 Ala. 532, 537, 15 So. 844; Rice ... v. Tobias, 89 Ala. 214, 7 So. 765; McDonald v ... Cawhorn, 152 Ala. 357, 44 So. 395; Fields v ... Henderson, 161 Ala. 534, 50 So. 56; Raisin Fertz ... Co. v. McKenna, 114 Ala. 274, 21 So. 816; Gill v ... More, 200 Ala. 511, 76 So. 453, ... ...
  • Murphree v. International Shoe Co.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1945
    ...to him. Prudential Casualty Co. v. Kerr, 202 Ala. 259(8), 80 So. 97; McAdams v. Windham, 191 Ala. 287, 68 So. 51; Fields v. Henderson, 161 Ala. 534, 50 So. 56. sustain that equity, the bill must allege not only want of notice, but that he has a good defense and in what that defense consists......
  • Vestavia Country Club v. Armstrong
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1958
    ...Casualty Co. v. Kerr, 202 Ala. 259, 80 So. 97; Golden v. Golden, 102 Ala. 353, 14 So. 638; Dunklin v. Wilson, 64 Ala. 162; Fields v. Henderson, 161 Ala. 534, 50 So. 56; Bolling v. Speller, 96 Ala. 269, 11 So. 300. The original jurisdiction of a court of equity is not affected by the four-mo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT