Fields v. Smith
| Docket Number | 10-2339 |
| Decision Date | 05 August 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
147 cases
-
Hernandez v. Cnty. of Monterey
...to meet the bona fide needs of [inmates] ... [and] maintain adequate facilities and staff for such service."); see also Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550, 559 (7th Cir.2011) (upholding preliminary injunction striking down, under the Eighth Amendment, state law that prohibited provision of certa......
-
Kosilek v. Spencer
...the Eighth Amendment because such forms of treatment could be medically necessary to treat some inmates adequately. See Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550, 556 (7th Cir.2011). In the instant case, Kosilek alleges that his rights under the Eighth Amendment are being violated by the DOC's refusal ......
-
Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.
...plaintiff with severe symptoms, including repeated self-castration attempts, states an Eighth Amendment claim); Fields v. Smith , 653 F.3d 550, 552–53, 558–59 (7th Cir. 2011) (law banning hormone treatment and GCS, even if medically necessary, violates the Eighth Amendment); De’lonta , 708 ......
-
Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.
...Rosati v. Igbinoso , 791 F.3d 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2015) ; De’lonta v. Johnson , 708 F.3d 520, 526 (4th Cir. 2013) ; Fields v. Smith , 653 F.3d 550, 556 (7th Cir. 2011).1 Edmo v. Idaho Dep’t of Corr. , 358 F. Supp. 3d 1103, 1109 (D. Idaho 2018), order clarified , No. 1:17-CV-00151-BLW, 2019......
Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
-
I. Issues of Importance to Lgbtq+ People and People Living with Hiv/aids
...1037 (9th Cir. 2015); DeLonta v. Johnson, 708 F.3d 520 (4th Cir. 2013); Battista v. Clarke, 645 F.3d 449 (1st Cir. 2011); Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011); White v. Farrier, 849 F.2d 322 (8th Cir. 1988); and Brown v. Zavaras, 63 F.3d 970 (10th Cir. 1995) Some transgender people......
-
Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
...Access to Health Care , supra note 453 (citing Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830 (E.D. Wis. 2010), supplemented (July 9, 2010), aff’d, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011) (holding a statute limiting preventing therapy/SRS for inmates was facially unconstitutional)). 472. 473. Id. 474. 475. LGBT......
-
Correctional facilities
...treatment by not providing sex reassignment surgery); see generally Kosilek v. Spencer, 774 F.3d 63 (1st Cir. 2014); Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011); De’Lonta v. Angelone, 330 F.3d 630 (4th Cir. 2003); Allard v. Gomez, 9 F. App’x 793 (9th Cir. 2001); Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.......
-
LIVING FREELY BEHIND BARS: REFRAMING THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER PRISONERS.
...diagnosed."). (89) Zhang, supra note 68, at 272; see, e.g., De'lonta v. Johnson, 708 F.3d 520 (4th Cir. 2013); Fields v. Smith. 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011); Allard v. Gomez, 9 F. App'x 793, 794 (9th Cir. (90) Zhang, supra note 68, at 272 (quoting Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408, 413 (......
Get Started for Free