Fields v. Smith
| Decision Date | 09 July 2010 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 06-C-112. |
| Citation | 712 F.Supp.2d 830 |
| Parties | Andrea FIELDS, Matthew Davison, also known as Jessica Davison, and Vankemah D. Moaton, Plaintiffs,v.Warden Judy P. SMITH, Thomas Edwards, James Greer, Roman Kaplan, MD, and Richard Raemisch, Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
John A. Knight, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc., Chicago, IL, Laurence J. Dupuis, American Civil Liberties Union of WI Foundation Inc., Milwaukee, WI, Dru M. Levasseur, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund Inc., New York, NY, Erik R. Guenther, Hurley Burish & Stanton SC, Madison, WI, for Plaintiffs.
Corey F. Finkelmeyer, Francis X. Sullivan, Jody J. Schmelzer, Monica A. Burkert Brist, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Defendants.
Following a court trial, in March 31, 2010, 2010 WL 1325165, this court entered an order declaring Wis. Stat. § 302.386(5m) unconstitutional and enjoining the enforcement of the statute. The following memorandum constitutes the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law underlying that order in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52.
Plaintiffs 1, who are Wisconsin prison inmates, bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for declaratory and injunctive relief claiming that the defendants violated the United States Constitution by enforcing 2005 Wisconsin Act 105, codified as Wis. Stat. § 302.386(5m) (Act 105), and abruptly terminating and depriving them of medical treatment for their serious health condition, Gender Identity Disorder (GID). Further, plaintiffs assert that the defendants acted without exercising individualized medical judgment and in contrast to the treatment the defendants provide to similarly situated inmates in Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC) facilities. Consequently, plaintiffs ask this court to find that the defendants have violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection and their Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Moreover, they ask that Wis. Stat. § 302.386(5m) be declared unconstitutional on its face. During the pendency of this case, the DOC has provided hormone therapy to plaintiffs under the terms of a preliminary injunction.
Plaintiff Andrea Fields is a male-to-female transsexual in DOC custody at Green Bay Correctional Institution (GBCI). The DOC has diagnosed Fields with GID. Fields has received feminizing hormone therapy continuously since 1996. In 2003, Fields underwent breast augmentation as a component of gender transition. After becoming incarcerated in 2005, the DOC confirmed Fields's GID diagnosis and continued hormone therapy. In 2006, because of the passage of Act 105, the DOC began to taper Fields's hormone therapy by halving the dosage. As a result of the reduction, Fields experienced nausea, muscle weakness, loss of appetite, increased hair growth, skin bumps, and depression. The reinstatement of Fields's hormone therapy following the preliminary injunction in this action abated the withdrawal symptoms.
Plaintiff Matthew Davison, also known as Jessica Davison, is a male-to-female transsexual in DOC custody at Oshkosh Correctional Institution (“OSCI”). The DOC has diagnosed Davison with GID. Prior to receiving hormone therapy, Davison attempted suicide by jumping off a roof. Davison was diagnosed with GID in 2005 and began hormone therapy as treatment for that condition shortly thereafter. The DOC has provided Davison with hormone therapy during incarceration. After arriving at Dodge Correctional Institution, the DOC began to withdraw Davison's hormone therapy because of Act 105. As a result of that withdrawal, Davison experienced increased and darker hair growth, voice deepening, breast reduction and leaking, mood swings, mental and emotional instability, hot flashes, and body aches. The reinstatement of Davison's hormone therapy because of the preliminary injunction in this action led to an abatement of withdrawal symptoms.
Plaintiff Vankemah Moaton is a male-to-female transsexual in DOC custody at Jackson Correctional Institution (JCI). The DOC has diagnosed Moaton with GID. Moaton has experienced suicidal ideation in the past, including after being removed from hormone therapy. Moaton began taking feminizing hormones in the late 1990s, took medically prescribed hormone therapy beginning in 2000, and has continued to receive that treatment during DOC incarceration. After entering DOC custody, the DOC began to withdraw Moaton's hormone therapy because of Act 105. As a result of that withdrawal, Moaton started growing chest and facial hair, developing tenderness in the chest and groin areas, and experiencing skin breakouts, hot flashes, and depression. The reinstatement of Moaton's hormone therapy because of the preliminary injunction in this action led to an abatement of withdrawal symptoms. All of plaintiffs have, to varying degrees, feminine physical characteristics as a result of their hormone usage.
Matthew J. Frank was, at the time this action was filed, the Secretary of the DOC. The current Secretary of the DOC is defendant Richard Raemisch. Defendant James Greer is the Director of the DOC Bureau of Health Services. Defendant Judy P. Smith is the Warden at OSCI. Defendant Thomas Edwards was the Health Services Unit Manager of the OSCI Health Services Unit until May 11, 2007. That position is currently vacant.
GID is classified as a psychiatric disorder in the DSM-IV-TR, the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM”). GID has been included in the DSM since the third edition of that manual, which was published in 1980. In prior editions, the DSM classified “transsexualism” as a psychiatric disorder. The following diagnostic criteria are listed in the DSM for GID: 1) a strong and persistent cross-gender identification; 2) a persistent discomfort with one's sex or a sense of inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex; 3) the disturbance is not concurrent with a physical intersex condition; and 4) the disturbance causes clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Matthew Davison, a/k/a Jessica Davison, has used a female name since childhood. Andrea Fields acted like a girl at school, talked like a girl, walked like a girl, wore makeup, and had a feminine hairstyle. Vankemah Moaton started behaving in a feminine manner prior to age eight.
Kenneth Krebs, a/k/a Karen Krebs, a male-to-female transsexual in DOC custody, cross-dressed as a child and adolescent. Erik Huelsbeck, a/k/a Erika Huelsbeck, another male-to-female transsexual held by the DOC, dressed as a girl for “dressed-up” day at school and other times, sometimes publicly.
DOC administrative personnel generally agree that deference on health care matters should be given to DOC health care staff. Sometimes the DOC prescribes hormone therapy for reasons that do not have to do with GID, such as estrogen replacement therapy in post-menopausal years, or for inmates with a congenital or hormonal disorder that requires the administration of hormone therapy.
The legislative sponsors of Act 105 labeled it the “Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act.” Act 105 provides:
(Ex. 24.)
The legislative sponsors issued multiple press releases prior to its passage stating that it was intended to prevent “bizarre taxpayer-funded sex change procedures” and to stop the DOC policy of “[allowing] pharmacists within the correction system to give hormones to an inmate diagnosed with gender identity disorder.” The only correctional or medical expertise offered during the legislative hearings regarding Act 105 was that of defendants' correctional medical personnel, Dr. Kevin Kallas and Dr. David Burnett. No other DOC representative testified before the legislature regarding Act 105. No one other than legislators spoke in support of the bill that became Act 105. An earlier draft of Act 105 made explicit reference to GID, banning the use of DOC funds “to provide or facilitate the provision of hormonal therapy or sexual reassignment surgery for the treatment of gender identity disorder.” Several of the press releases issued by the sponsors of Act 105 noted specifically that the issue of sex reassignment treatment for inmates came to light when they learned that a Wisconsin transgender inmate was receiving treatment that led her to develop “female characteristics, such as breasts.”
While sex reassignment surgery is more expensive than hormone therapy, DOC provides surgeries of equal or...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hawkins v. Sharp
.... . . would jeopardize prison security" and "raise concerns about the transmission of diseases, such as HIV."); Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830, 868 (E.D. Wis. 2010) ("The correctional environment can be dangerous, and one major area of security concern is sexual activity, especially s......
-
Fields v. Smith
...all the evidence presented at trial—the district court's 40–page opinion thoroughly describes the trial testimony, see Fields v. Smith, 712 F.Supp.2d 830 (E.D.Wis.2010)—but a brief review of the district court's critical factual findings is warranted. The district court credited much of the......
-
Flack v. Wis. Dept. of Health Servs.
...87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985) ; Romer v. Evans , 517 U.S. 620, 634, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 (1996) ) );26 see also Fields v. Smith , 712 F.Supp.2d 830, 868 (E.D. Wis. 2010) (granting permanent injunction blocking Wisconsin statute preventing the Department of Corrections from providing tran......
-
Hicklin v. Anne Precynthe, Ian Wallace, Cindy Griffith, Stan Payne, Scott O'Kelly, Deloise Williams, Corizon Health, Inc., Case No. 4:16-cv-01357-NCC
...(1st Cir. 2011) (upholding district court decision recognizing gender identity disorder as a serious medical need); Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830, 862 (E.D. Wis. 2010) (gender identity disorder is a serious medical need for purposes of the Eighth Amendment), aff'd, 653 F.3d 550 (7th ......
-
Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
...C.I.R., 134 T.C. 34 (2010)) [hereinafter Equal Access to Health Care ]. But see Equal Access to Health Care (citing Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830 (E.D. Wis. 2010), supplemented (July 9, 2010), aff’d, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011) (holding a statute limiting preventing therapy/SRS for ......
-
Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
...O’Donnabhain v. C.I.R., 134 T.C. 34 (2010)). But see FAQ: Equal Access to Health Care , supra note 453 (citing Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830 (E.D. Wis. 2010), supplemented (July 9, 2010), aff’d, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011) (holding a statute limiting preventing therapy/SRS for inmat......
-
Equal Protection for Transgendered Employees? Analyzing the Court’s Call for More Than Rational Basis in the Glenn v. Brumby Decision
...claims . . . is an open question."52 It would seem Judge Story attempted to answer this open 48. See, e.g., Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830, 868 (E.D. Wis. 2010) (applying rational basis review to plaintiff's challenge of a state law preventing treatment of gender identity disorder to ......
-
Binary Imprisonment: Transgender Inmates Ensnared Within the System and Confined to Assigned Gender
...Cal. 2015); Konitzer, 711 F. Supp. 2d 874; Adams v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 716 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D. Mass. 2010); Fields v. Smith, 712 F. Supp. 2d 830 (E.D. Wis. 2010); Sunstrom v. Frank, 630 F. Supp. 2d 974 (E.D. Wis. 2007); Declaration of Dr. Randi Ettner, Diamond, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12......