Fields v. South Carolina

Decision Date18 March 1963
Docket NumberNo. 399,399
Citation9 L.Ed.2d 965,83 S.Ct. 887,372 U.S. 522
PartiesJames FIELDS et al. v. SOUTH CAROLINA
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Julian S. Wolfe, for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680.

Mr. Justice CLARK dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Edwards v. South Carolina, supra.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Austin Congress Corp. v. Mannina
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • January 14, 1964
    ...position. The cases of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 L.Ed.2d 697 and Fields v. South Carolina (per curiam), 372 U.S. 522, 83 S.Ct. 887, 9 L.Ed.2d 965 cited by appellants, both upholding the right to picket for the purpose of furthering a racial integration policy,......
  • People v. Turner
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • November 12, 1965
    ... ... and left on Seventh Avenue 'to avoid persons who were in the street walking north and south around the demonstration'. Some of the demonstrators, including some defendants, were in the ... Appellants rely heavily on Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 L.Ed.2d 697, and Cox v. State of Louisiana, supra, but analysis of ... South Carolina, supra, and Fields v. South Carolina, 375 U.S. 44, 84 S.Ct. 149, 11 L.Ed.2d 107, constituting an infringement by ... ...
  • People v. Penn
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • October 15, 1964
    ... ... In support of their position they cite the cases of Edwards v. State of South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 L.Ed.2d 697 (1963); Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 U.S ... (Followed in Fields v. So. Carolina, 375 U.S. 44, 84 S.Ct. 149, 11 L.Ed.2d 107; s. c. 372 U.S. 522, 83 S.Ct. 887.) ... ...
  • Congress of Racial Equality v. Douglas
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 15, 1963
    ...rights of free speech, free assembly, and freedom to petition for redress of their grievances." See also Fields v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 522, 83 S.Ct. 887, 9 L.Ed.2d 965. Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315, 71 S.Ct. 303, 95 L.Ed. 267, is the case heavily relied on by South Carolina in the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT