Fields v. State, No. 55849
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
| Writing for the Court | DONNELLY; MORGAN; FINCH |
| Citation | 468 S.W.2d 31 |
| Parties | James Marvin FIELDS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 55849 |
| Decision Date | 14 June 1971 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 practice notes
-
Blair v. Armontrout, No. 92-1734
...to the error lodged at trial, and the issue is not raised on direct appeal or post-conviction proceedings. See, e.g., Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.1971). One notable exception is Benson v. State, 611 S.W.2d 538, 541 (Mo.Ct.App.1980). We specifically rejected the argument Blair now mak......
-
Garton v. Swenson, No. 18547-1.
...`endanger the delicate federal-state relationship in the criminal law enforcement field,'" quoting from Fields v. State (Mo.1971), 468 S.W.2d 31. Fields, of course, was a comparatively recent case in which the Supreme Court of Missouri did take note of another Eighth Circuit opinion on a fe......
-
McCrary v. State, No. 36400
...proceedings. Beach v. State, 488 S.W.2d 652, 655 (Mo.1972); Brodkowicz v. State, Page 471 474 S.W.2d 822, 827 (Mo.1972); Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31, 32 (Mo.1971) 3; State v. Caffey, 457 S.W.2d 657, 659 (Mo.1970); Lewis v. State, 513 S.W.2d 772, 774 Movant's claim must be denied on anoth......
-
Neal v. State, No. 13117
...objection was made at trial, and the point was not mentioned in the motion for new trial or briefed on direct appeal. In Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.1971), a contention that certain State's evidence was inadmissible because it was obtained by unlawful search and seizure was held not ......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Blair v. Armontrout, No. 92-1734
...to the error lodged at trial, and the issue is not raised on direct appeal or post-conviction proceedings. See, e.g., Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.1971). One notable exception is Benson v. State, 611 S.W.2d 538, 541 (Mo.Ct.App.1980). We specifically rejected the argument Blair now mak......
-
Garton v. Swenson, No. 18547-1.
...`endanger the delicate federal-state relationship in the criminal law enforcement field,'" quoting from Fields v. State (Mo.1971), 468 S.W.2d 31. Fields, of course, was a comparatively recent case in which the Supreme Court of Missouri did take note of another Eighth Circuit opinion on a fe......
-
McCrary v. State, No. 36400
...proceedings. Beach v. State, 488 S.W.2d 652, 655 (Mo.1972); Brodkowicz v. State, Page 471 474 S.W.2d 822, 827 (Mo.1972); Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31, 32 (Mo.1971) 3; State v. Caffey, 457 S.W.2d 657, 659 (Mo.1970); Lewis v. State, 513 S.W.2d 772, 774 Movant's claim must be denied on anoth......
-
Neal v. State, No. 13117
...objection was made at trial, and the point was not mentioned in the motion for new trial or briefed on direct appeal. In Fields v. State, 468 S.W.2d 31 (Mo.1971), a contention that certain State's evidence was inadmissible because it was obtained by unlawful search and seizure was held not ......
Request a trial to view additional results