Fields v. Walker
| Decision Date | 06 March 1917 |
| Citation | Fields v. Walker, 174 Ky. 461, 192 S.W. 491 (Ky. Ct. App. 1917) |
| Parties | FIELDS v. WALKER ET AL. |
| Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Perry County.
Suit by Sarah Fields against Jeremiah Walker and others. Decree dismissing the petition, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Miller Wheeler & Craft, of Hazard, for appellant.
Faulkner & Faulkner, and John B. Eversole, all of Hazard, for appellees.
In this action brought in the Perry circuit court by the appellant Sarah Fields, against Jeremiah Walker, R. F. Fields, and others, she sought the cancellation of a deed made by her brothers and sisters, named in the petition, to her former husband, R. F. Fields, a deed made by the latter to the appellee Jeremiah Walker, and the recovery of the land described in both deeds. It was, in substance, alleged in the petition that shortly prior to the death of her father, John Walker, Sr., his children, including the appellant, by his direction divided among them his lands, the possession of which he surrendered to them for that purpose, and that though she joined in the various deeds of partition conveying to her brothers and sisters the lands allotted them respectively in the division of their father's lands, the part allotted her in the division, without her knowledge or consent and by fraud and collusion between her then husband R. F. Fields, and her brother, Jeremiah Walker, was by deed conveyed by her brothers and sisters and the wives and husbands, respectively, of the latter, to R. F. Fields, and by him, several years after her father's death, to Jeremiah Walker, in which last-named deed she, by the fraud of R. F. Fields and Jeremiah Walker, and their threats that R. F. Fields would take her life if she refused, was forced to unite; that in the year 1915, R. F. Fields, by suit in the Perry circuit court, obtained a decree divorcing her, but without restoring to her the land mentioned, the title to which he acquired in the manner and by the fraudulent means above indicated; that prior to her former husband's obtention of the divorce from her, she labored under the disability of coverture, which, together with her fear of him, prevented her from bringing an action to recover her land; and that she did not discover that the land allotted her in the division of her father's lands had been conveyed by her brothers and sisters to R. F. Fields until shortly before the institution of this action to recover it.
A general demurrer filed by R. F. Fields and Jeremiah Walker to the petition was sustained by the circuit court and her petition dismissed at her cost. From the judgment manifesting these rulings, she has appealed.
The judgment does not indicate the ground upon which the circuit court sustained the demurrer. It is claimed by appellant's counsel that it was because of the opinion entertained by the court that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, and by appellees' counsel that it was because the court was of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
West v. W.T.B. Williams & Sons
... ... 177, 100 S.W. 848, 30 ... Ky. Law. Rep. 1287; Green County v. Howard, 127 Ky ... 379, 105 S.W. 897, 32 Ky. Law. Rep. 243; Fields v ... Walker, 174 Ky. 461, 192 S.W. 491; Merritt v ... Cravens, 168 Ky. 155, 181 S.W. 970, L. R. A. 1917F, 935; ... Davidson v. Ky. Land Co., ... ...
-
Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Orr's Adm'r
... ... Law Rep. 660; ... Smith v. Smith, 56 S.W. 968, 22 Ky. Law Rep. 255; ... Hawkins v. Northern Coal & Coke Co., 145 Ky. 118, ... 140 S.W. 48; Fields v. Walker, 174 Ky. 463, 192 S.W ... The ... trial court followed these decisions in giving judgment for ... the plaintiff, and ... ...
- Shaws' Guardian, Louisville Trust Co. v. Grimes, Executor
-
Dunn v. Dunn
...and applied in the following cases: Phillips v. Phillips, 173 Ky. 608, 191 S.W. 482; Golding v. Golding, 82 Ky. 51; Fields v. Walker et al., 174 Ky. 461, 192 S.W. 491; Pruett v. Pruett, 178 Ky. 802, 199 S.W. There is little or no doubt that the property in question came directly through and......