Files v. Buie
Decision Date | 02 February 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 2134-7035.,2134-7035. |
Citation | 112 S.W.2d 714 |
Parties | FILES et al. v. BUIE et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Mrs. Dellah Buie filed her final account as the guardian of Mrs. S. V. E. Covert, a non compos mentis. Tom Files and others contested the account in the probate court, and some of the contestants appealed to the district court. The district court reduced the amount of the guardian's claim, and Tom Files and some of the contestants brought error to the Court of Civil Appeals which certified a question to the Supreme Court.
Question answered.
Marrow & Calvert and Will M. Martin, all of Hillsboro, for appellants.
John Abney and Andrew J. Bryan, Jr., both of Hillsboro, for appellees.
GERMAN, Commissioner.
The certificate of the Court of Civil Appeals is as follows:
To this statement we add the following: The record discloses that after the death of the ward, and prior to the action of the probate court upon the final account, W. C. Covert, surviving husband of the ward, qualified as temporary administrator of her estate. The judgment of the probate court contains the following recital:
"It appeared from the citations and returns on file herein that notice of filing said account had been duly issued, served, published and returned in the manner and form and for the length of time required by law, thereupon W. C. Covert, surviving husband and temporary administrator of the estate of the ward, Mrs. S. V. Edrington Covert, deceased, acting under appointment of this Court, appeared in his representative capacity on behalf of the estate of said decedent, and represented the interest of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Baldwin v. Davis Hill Oil Co.
...12 S.W. 75; and also see Young v. Gray, 60 Tex. 541; Marlow v. Lacy, 68 Tex. 154, 2 S.W. 52; Carpenter v. Soloman, supra; Files v. Buie, 131 Tex. 19, 112 S.W.2d 714. However, comparison of Articles 2593, 2594 and 2764, R.S.1895 shows that a material difference was made between the determina......
-
Pfeffer v. Meissner
...to name in the petition for the writ all parties whose interest might be affected by reversal or modification is fatal. Files v. Buie, 1938, 131 Tex. 19, 112 S.W.2d 714. We now rule that Elna and Cynthia Pfeffer were parties to the prior appeal in Cause No. 8015 of the trial court, No. 12,7......
-
Roberts v. Roberts
...the party is required to answer. Petitioner's points (and assertions) 1 and 2 are sustained. Reversed and remanded. 1 See Files v. Buie, 131 Tex. 19, 112 S.W.2d 714; and Files v. Buie, Tex.Civ.App., 113 S.W.2d 698, for interpretation of Article ...
-
Hackfeld v. Ryburn
...to the suit. All parties adversely interested, whether parties to the suit or not, must be named in the writ of error. Files v. Buie, 131 Tex. 19, 112 S.W.2d 714 (1938). By their petition for writ of error appellants seek a judgment by this court setting aside the probate of a will containi......