Findwhat.com v. Findwhat Investor Grp., 11–1250.

Decision Date01 October 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11–1250.,11–1250.
Citation184 L.Ed.2d 23,133 S.Ct. 109 (Mem),568 U.S. 814
Parties FINDWHAT.COM, et al., petitioners, v. FINDWHAT INVESTOR GROUP.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • C & C Family Trust 04/04/05 v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • August 28, 2014
    ...a consequence of the fraud.FindWhat Investor Grp. v. FindWhat.com, 658 F.3d 1282, 1296 (11th Cir.2011), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 109, 184 L.Ed.2d 23 (2012). In short, the plaintiff must plead facts that when taken as true establish the who, what, when, where, how and why of th......
  • Callinan v. Lexicon Pharm., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • August 14, 2020
    ...Id. at 320-21 (quoting FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat.com, 658 F.3d 1282, 1311-12 (11th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 814, 133 S. Ct. 109, 184 L.Ed.2d 23 (2012) (emphasis added)). While the corrective disclosure need not be "complete" and "need not precisely mirror [an] earlier mi......
  • Heck v. Orion Grp. Holdings, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • June 19, 2020
    ...Id. at 320-21 (quoting FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat.com, 658 F.3d 1282, 1311-12 (11th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 814, 133 S. Ct. 109, 184 L.Ed.2d 23 (2012) (emphasis added)). While the corrective disclosure need not be "complete" and "need not precisely mirror [an] earlier mi......
  • Edwards v. Wis. Pharmacal Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • December 13, 2013
    ...a consequence of the fraud.FindWhat Investor Grp. v. FindWhat.com, 658 F.3d 1282, 1296 (11th Cir.2011), cert. denied,––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 109, 184 L.Ed.2d 23 (2012). Edwards's complaint references only a single affirmative statement by the Defendants about the insect repellant, an “adve......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT