Finn v. Finn
Decision Date | 26 February 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84-698,84-698 |
Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 507,464 So.2d 1266 |
Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 507 Dianna Lee FINN, Appellant, v. John Aubrey FINN, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Lisa Bennett, Miami, for appellant.
English, McCaughan & O'Bryan and Robert J. Schaffer, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
This appeal and cross-appeal challenge portions of a judgment concerning the jointly owned marital home rendered after the cause was remanded in Finn v. Finn, 414 So.2d 1149(Fla. 3d DCA1982).
Although the father was again awarded custody of the minor children, he has remarried and, contrary to the order below, is not thereafter entitled to exclusive possession of the home.Schein v. Schein, 448 So.2d 16(Fla. 3d DCA1984);Abella-Fernandez v. Abella, 393 So.2d 40(Fla. 3d DCA1981).The property in question is therefore subject to partition upon remand.
The parties have agreed in open court before us that the ex-husband, who has paid the mortgage, repairs and other expenses since the dissolution, should be given credit upon the partition sale for all, including the wife's half, of those amounts.SeeIodice v. Scoville, 460 So.2d 576(Fla. 4th DCA1984).Subsequent to the date of Mr. Finn's remarriage, however, the ex-wife is entitled to a credit of one-half of the reasonable rental value of the home.Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So.2d 770(Fla. 2d DCA1975).
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Diedricks v. Reinhardt
...DCA 1981); Seesholts v. Beers, 270 So.2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). But see Potter v. Garrett, 52 So.2d 115 (Fla.1951) 2; Finn v. Finn, 464 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (following Potter and Seesholts dissent, court allowed recovery of one......
-
Goolsby v. Wiley
...rent for the period of time the husband was in possession without benefit of court order or agreement. Subsequently, in Finn v. Finn, 464 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), where the husband was awarded exclusive possession under certain conditions and he later remarried which terminated his ri......
-
Bailes v. Bailes
...represents an expenditure for her benefit at least substantially equivalent to the rental value of her interest. See Finn v. Finn, 464 So.2d 1266, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Moreover, any uncompensated use of the home by the children and their custodian-father may properly have been regarded by th......
-
Barbare v. Napier
...value of the home thereafter as an offset to the one given her because she made all the mortgage payments. In our view, Finn v. Finn, 464 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which so indicates, has not been overruled by subsequent supreme court decisions on the issue. See Kelly v. Kelly, 583 So.......