Fiorella v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22542.

Decision Date17 May 1966
Docket NumberNo. 22542.,22542.
PartiesSam and Katherine FIORELLA, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

William S. Pritchard, Winston B. McCall, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioners, Pritchard, McCall & Jones, John H. Harper, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.

John B. Jones, Jr., Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Mitchell Rogovin, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Eugene F. Colella, Atty., I. R. S., Donald W. Williamson, Jr., Meyer Rothwacks, Joseph M. Howard, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Richard M. Roberts, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge and KILKENNY,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Sam Fiorella, a lottery operator, kept no books and records for income tax purposes. The Commissioner made deficiency assessments against him for the years 1956, 1957, and 1958 on the basis of reconstructing his income.

The Tax Court carefully considered these assessments and drastically reduced them by using a slightly lower daily gambling income average and by substantially lowering the number of days of operation. Still dissatisfied, Mr. and Mrs. Fiorella appealed. We are convinced that the method of reconstruction of income as approved by the Tax Court was proper from the standpoint of theory and substance. The facts on which the method operated are amply supported by the record, and these same facts are adequate to support the finding of fraud.

Affirmed.

* Of Portland, Oregon, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Hamilton v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 14 Noviembre 1969
    ...198 F.Supp. 367 (E.D.N.Y.1961); Shades Ridge Holding Co. T.C. Memo 1964-275, affd. per curiam sub nom. Fiorella v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 361 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966); Isaac T. Mitchell, T.C. Memo 1968-137 (1968) (appeal pending). Resort to such methods of computation here became......
  • Simkins v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 28 Agosto 1978
    ...Inc. v. Commissioner Dec. 27,014(M), T.C. Memo 1964-275, affd. per curiam sub nom. Fiorella v. Commissioner 66-1 USTC ¶ 9423, 361 F. 2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966), which also dealt with a numbers operation and employed a 30 percent of bets figure to determine Respondent was justified in using this......
  • Conforte v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 8 Septiembre 1980
    ...63 T.C. 51, 61 (1974), modified 63 T.C. 501 (1975), affd. per curiam 572 F.2d 193 (9th Cir. 1977) (1 day); Fiorella v. Commissioner, 361 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966), affg. per curiam a Memorandum Opinion of this Court (2 days); Gerardo v. Commissioner, 552 F.2d 549, 551, 553 (3d Cir. 1977), af......
  • Estate of Whitt v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • 12 Mayo 1983
    ...is to be ascertained by an examination of the taxpayer's entire course of conduct, Fiorella v. Commissioner 66-1 USTC ¶ 9423, 361 F. 2d 326 (5th Cir. 1966), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court Dec. 27,014(M), we must examine the course of conduct of Loyd and Willard Whitt and the e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT