First Methodist Church v. Berryman

Decision Date07 April 1924
Docket NumberNo. 23645.,23645.
PartiesFIRST METHODIST CHURCH OP POPLAR BLUFF v. BERRYMAN et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Butler County; Almon Ing, Judge.

Action by the First Methodist Church of Poplar Bluff against John W. Berryman and others. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

W. H. Meredith and E. R. Lentz, both of Poplar Bluff, for appellant.

Atkinson, Rombauer & Hill, of St. Louis, for respondents.

HIGBEE, C.

This is an action to cancel a deed, dated September 6, 1918, ostensibly executed by plaintiff's officers, conveying a lot and building thereon in Poplar Bluff then owned and used by plaintiff as a place of worship, to the defendants as trustees for the Methodist Episcopal Church, South, of that city. On a trial, the court dismissed the petition and decreed title to the premises in suit to be in defendants as trustees for the M. E. Church, South. Plaintiff appeals and contends that on the evidence the judgment should have been in its favor. The pleadings are very lengthy.

The petition was filed on May 7, 1921. It avers, in substance: That on September 6, 1918, and prior thereto, plaintiff, a religious corporation, was the owner of said property and occupied it as a place of worship; that the defendants, fraudulently conspiring with W. H. Yount, then pastor of plaintiff church, and with William Spaulding, J. Elliot Smith, W. F. S. Taylor, Ira W. Seybold, Louis F. Ritz, and C. A. Gierth, who falsely claimed and pretended to be officers and trustees of plaintiff corporation, for the purpose of cheating and defrauding plaintiff out of said property, did procure said Spaulding, acting as president, and said Smith, acting as secretary, to execute a deed conveying said property to defendants as trustees of said M. E. Church, South, which deed was also signed by slid Spaulding, Smith, Taylor, Seybold, Ritz, and Gierth as trustees, for the expressed consideration of $5,203; that no part thereof was paid, but said deed was wholly without consideration; that plaintiff was duly incorporated December 4, 1906; that article VIII of the articles of association reads:

"This association shall have power, with the consent of the Quarterly Conference of said Methodist Episcopal Church, preacher in charge and presiding elder of the district, to sell or mortgage any real estate that may be hereafter acquired by it, to secure funds for improvements made, whenever it shall become expedient to do so; in which event, the proceeds shall be used and applied in accordance with the discipline of the said church; but in no event shall the property be mortgaged to secure the current expenses of the said church."

That thereafter on October 8, 1907, the trustees, holding title for the first M. E. Church of Poplar Bluff, before its incorporation, conveyed said property to the plaintiff corporation as a place of divine worship for the use and benefit of the ministry and membership of the M. E. Church.

That section 361 of the Book of Doctrines and Discipline of the Methodist Episcopal Church provides:

"Whenever it shall become necessary for the payment of debts, or with view to reinvestment, to mortgage or make sale of the church that may have been conveyed to trustees of a church corporation, for either of the foregoing purposes, the said trustees or their successors, upon application to the Quarterly Conference may obtain an order for mortgage or sale—a majority of all the members of the Quarterly Conference concurring, and the pastor of the church and the district superintendent of the district consenting—with such limitations and restrictions as the Quarterly Conference may judge necessary, said trustees may mortgage or sell and convey such property."

That the trustees of plaintiff corporation did not make an application to the Quarterly Conference for an order for the sale of said property, nor did a majority of all the members of the Quarterly Conference concur in the proposition to sell said property, nor did the district superintendent of said district consent thereto, and that said sale was void; that Spaulding was not president nor were he and said Taylor, Ritz, or Gierth trustees of said corporation; that said deed was made in furtherance of an agreement and conspiracy between defendants and the said pretended officers of plaintiff corporation for the purpose of transferring the membership and property of the church and corporation to the use and benefit of the defendant M. E. Church, South, in disregard of the laws, customs, and usages of the M. E. Church in the United States of America, which fraudulent purposes were known and participated in by the defendants at the time they accepted said deed; that defendants took possession of said property upon the execution of said deed.

The prayer is for the cancellation of the deed, for rents and profits, and for restoration of the property.

The answer is a general denial and a cross-bill averring in substance the purchase of the property in good faith and the execution of the deed conveying said property by plaintiff through its proper officers to the defendants as trustees of the M. E. Church, South, .of Poplar Bluff, for church purposes, which church then had and ever since has had the same Articles of Faith and Creed as the M. E. Church; that said purchase by the defendants was part of a plan to unite said churches for worship in the church building on said premises, which plan has been almost completely accomplished, and now said church property is the place of regular worship of 729 members largely made up of the membership of the theretofore separate churches; that $5,203 was the monetary consideration expressed in the deed; that before defendants or any officer of the defendant church had notice that plaintiff claimed any fraud had been perpetrated by any of plaintiff's officials in said transaction, the defendant paid in cash of said consideration $1,659.34, and obligated itself to pay the balance thereof to various creditors of plaintiff, and since said purchase have offered to pay and are still ready and willing and offer to pay the whole of said consideration; that defendants have expended more than $1,000 in improving said property; that the several officials who executed said deed were at the time held by plaintiff and represented to defendants by plaintiff as the de jure officials and legal representatives of plaintiff and authorized to sell and convey said premises, and defendants, so believing, paid and assumed the consideration of said deed which constituted the amount of plaintiff's indebtedness at the time of said purchase; that said premises were so sold for the purpose of paying such debts and uniting the two churches; that the purchase of said property and the plan of uniting said churches was immediately published in the newspapers in said city, all of which facts plaintiff well knew at all times; that plaintiff stood by, saw the transaction made, the money paid, and the balance assumed without protest or objection, and since the sale and until the commencement of this suit have acquiesced therein and ought to be estopped from prosecuting or maintaining this suit; that defendant trustees are the owners of the legal title to said premises for the use and benefit of defendant church, and plaintiff's claim is adverse and prejudicial to the rights of defendants. Wherefore defendants pray the court to dismiss the petition and to determine and adjudge by its decree the title to said property, etc.

The reply reavers allegations of the petition as to fraud, etc.

There are some facts conceded or not contested. The plaintiff, the M. E. Church, of Poplar Bluff, had a membership of about 100, a lot and church building, variously estimated to be worth from $6,000 to $25,000, but no parsonage. It was bankrupt, unable to pay the sums due its pastors, the district superintendent, its janitor, or its current bills. Its indebtedness, in August, 1918, was $5,203. This included two notes secured by deeds of trust on the property for about $3,544, principal and accrued interest, and various other debts to the amount of about $1,659. The church building needed a furnace and various repairs. The M. E. Church, South, had a membership of about 300, a good parsonage, but no church building. The Articles of Faith and Discipline of the M. E. Church and the M. E. Church, South, were identical, and had been ever since the separation or division of the M. E. Church in 1844 over the question of slavery. For a year or more there had been a growing, if not an overwhelming, sentiment in favor of the union of the two local religious bodies. Mr. Yount, the pastor, testified he had discussed the condition of the church and the necessity of the sale of the church property to the M. E. Church, South, with Dr. Crissman, district superintendent, and bad written him several letters urging the calling of a Quarterly Conference to consider a proposition to sell the property. Yount telegraphed Criss-man on August 5, 1918, and received the following telegram in answer:

"Rev. W. E. Yount, Poplar Bluff, Mo. Your letter at hand. You are hereby authorized to call Fourth Quarterly Conference August 8th or any other suitable date to transact such business as you deem wise. Will write you tomorrow."

Yount accordingly called a Quarterly Conference for August 12, 1918, making the usual announcements thereof from the pulpit at the morning and evening services on the previous Sunday. The record of this meeting shows present, W. H. Yount, acting presiding elder, Dr. Seybold, Dr. Taylor, Wm. Spaulding, Mrs. Marion Sanders, Louis F. Ritz, Miss Ruble Phillips, Mrs. Wm. Spaulding, and Joe Kilpatrick, Ira W. Seybold, and W. F. S. Taylor, elected trustees. The record of the meeting shows Wm, Spaulding, J. E. Smith, C. A. Gierth, Ira W. Seybold, W. F. S. Taylor, Louis F. Ritz, and C. H. Hargrove to be the trustees of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Lewis v. Brubaker
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1929
    ...simple; it was not repugnant to the 1865 Constitution. Dudley v. Clark, 255 Mo. 588; Glaze v. Allen (Mo.), 213 S.W. 784; First Methodist Church v. Berryman, 303 Mo. 475; Stewart v. Easton, 170 U.S. 397; Constitution 1865, Art. 1, secs. 12, 13; Constitution 1875, Art. 2, sec. 8; Art. 15, sec......
  • McKay v. Snider
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1945
    ... ... Richmond, ... 280 Mo. 30, 217 S.W. 74; First Methodist Church v ... Berryman, 303 Mo. 475, 261 S.W. 73; Taylor v ... ...
  • Kansas City v. Rathford
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1945
    ... ... 266, 165 S.W. 734; ... Stierman v. Meissner, 253 S.W. 383; First ... Methodist Church of Poplar Bluff v. Berryman, 303 Mo ... 475, 261 ... ...
  • Butler County v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 9, 1944
    ... ... Thompson v. Cohen, 29 S.W. 885; First Methodist ... Church of Poplar Bluff v. Berryman, 261 S.W. 73; Mo ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT