First Nat. Bank v. Watters
Decision Date | 27 June 1918 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 999 |
Parties | FIRST NAT. BANK OF MOBILE v. WATTERS. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Saffold Berney, Judge.
Proceedings for the settlement of the accounts of the First National Bank of Mobile, as administrator, etc., opposed by Ethel H Watters. From decree sustaining exceptions to the part of the register's report making allowance to the guardian ad litem of a minor legatee, the administrator appeals. Reversed, and cause remanded.
Allowance to general guardian ad litem of county acting for minor on partial settlement of administrator's accounts, of practically maximum fee fixed by Gen.Acts 1915, p. 261, for general guardian ad litem, was improper as contrary to purpose of statute, "case," as used, embracing all proceedings of a case in court.
Harry T. Smith & Caffey, of Mobile, for appellant.
Stevens McCorvey & McLeod, of Mobile, for appellee.
The appeal is taken from a decree sustaining exceptions to the register's report.
By the last will of Julian A. Watters, deceased, the City Bank & Trust Company was nominated executor, and duly qualified as such in the probate court. The estate was removed to the chancery court on petition of the widow of the deceased. The said bank was reorganized as, or changed its name to, the National City Bank, and tendered its resignation as executor and trustee; and thereupon a reference was ordered on settlement of its said administration.
The chancellor appointed in said "case," as guardian ad litem for the minor legatees under this will, the general guardian ad litem of Mobile county. The consent was to act "as guardian ad litem of the minor legatee, Julian A. Watters, Jr., on the proceedings for final settlement in the above cause"--"In the Matter of the Estate (No. 11147) of Julian A. Watters, Deceased."
The register reported:
That the National City Bank, as executor and trustee, is
From the decree sustaining exceptions to that part of the register's report making allowance to the guardian ad litem, the appeal is taken. It (such part) was:
"And it further appearing to the court that the calculation of the fees due to the said guardian ad litem can readily be determined from the file and proceedings in said cause by the court without the aid of a further reference, and that the said guardian ad litem is entitled for his services on the final settlement by the National City Bank to the amount claimed by him, viz., $94.13, it is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that the fee of the said guardian ad litem, V.B. McAleer, for services rendered to the minor legatee, Julian A. Watters, on the final settlement by the National City Bank, as trustee and executor, be, and the same hereby is, fixed at $94.13, and that the said amount be forthwith paid over to the said guardian ad litem by the First National Bank of Mobile, the successor trustee."
The act creating the office of general guardian ad litem for Mobile county contains this provision:
"That the fees of said general guardian ad litem shall be one per centum of the total amount or interest of the minor or minors, who are represented by said general guardian ad litem, involved in the case in which the general guardian ad litem acts: Provided that the minimum fee shall in no case be less than five dollars, and the maximum fee shall in no case be more than one hundred dollars, and that fees of such officer be collected as other costs in the case." Gen.Acts 1915, p. 261, § 3.
Section 5 of the act provides:
"That the office of guardian ad litem shall be filled by appointment by the Governor and that his term of office shall be for four years and until his successor qualifies."
The court takes judicial knowledge that the Governor appointed a general guardian ad litem for Mobile county after the approval of the act, and that it was Mr. Vincent B. McAleer, and that his term of office had not expired at the time of the appointment, by the chancellor, of said Mr. Vincent B. McAleer as guardian ad litem for the infant, Julian A. Watters, Jr. The order of his appointment recites:
Appellee's insistence is that appellant petitioned the court to appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the minor legatee, Julian A. Watters, on the final settlement by the National City Bank, and that the settlement was final within the meaning of the statute providing a general guardian ad litem, as affecting his compensation for the service rendered.
The duties of the general guardian ad litem, as defined by the act, are:
It will be observed that by the requirements of section 6 the general guardian ad litem, unless disqualified, must represent the interest of the minors whose interests are not antagonistic, and that only in the event of his disqualification, or of antagonism in interest, may other guardians ad litem be appointed to represent such interests of minors.
The purpose of the act was to secure for the minor's interest a representation efficient, honest, and inexpensive at all stages of the proceedings in the "case"; that is to say, a representation of the minor's interest by one familiar with the questions at issue and with such proceedings, and who is disinterested, being sufficiently compensated for the service discharged.
What then is the meaning of the word "case," as employed in the act? It finds expression in the context, "involved in the case in which the general guardian ad litem acts," and is further indicated in the provision that the fees "shall in no case be less...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McClurkin v. McClurkin
... ... Clifford v. Montgomery, 202 Ala. 609, 81 So. 551; ... First Nat. Bank v. Watters, 201 Ala. 670, 672, 79 ... So. 242; Plunkett v ... ...
-
Drennen Motor Co. v. State
...of the act. (Citations Omitted.)' State v. Wertheimer Bag Co., 253 Ala. 124, 128, 43 So.2d 824, 827. See: First National Bank of Mobile v. Watters, 201 Ala. 670, 79 So. 242; and Hamm v. Continental Gin Co., 276 Ala, 611, 165 So.2d We are persuaded that the designation and use of the automob......
-
Peterson v. Ustrud (In re Peterson's Estate)
...fees for legal services necessarily rendered at her request. See also McGowan v. Milner, 195 Ala. 44, 70 So. 175;First Nat. Bank v. Watters, 201 Ala. 670, 79 So. 242, 244;In re Coleman, 106 S. C. 534, 91 S. E. 861; 24 C. J. 48, 97, 100; In re Springer's Estate, 79 Mont. 256, 255 P. 1058;Est......
-
Wilkinson v. McCall, 6 Div. 322.
... ... Likewise the Birmingham ... Trust & Savings Company and also the First National Bank ... or Birmingham refused to serve. Finally Judge Bailes ... C.J.S., Attorney and Client, § 166, p. 1023. See also ... First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Watters, 201 Ala. 670, ... 79 So. 242; McKenzie v ... ...