First Nat. Bank v. Hungate

Decision Date18 June 1894
Citation62 F. 548
PartiesFIRST NAT. BANK OF WALLA WALLA v. HUNGATE.
CourtUnited States Circuit Court, District of Washington, Southern Division

B. L. &amp J. L. Sharpstein, for complainant.

Miles Poindexter, for defendant.

HANFORD District Judge.

The amended bill of complaint shows that for the year 1892 the assessor of Walla Walla county assessed the individual shareholders of the complaining bank separately for a certain number of shares of First National Bank stock, and unjustly discriminated against said shareholders by valuing their shares at 300 per cent. of the face value, which is considerably above the actual cash value of said complainant's stock while a large amount of other moneyed capital in the county owned by individual citizens of this state was intentionally omitted from the assessment roll, and permitted to entirely escape taxation. The bill also alleges that one of the shareholders applied at the proper time to the county board of equalization to reduce the assessment on his shares, and that the board refused to make any reduction, or in any manner correct the inequality of said assessment, and at the same time made a declaration of a general policy to refuse to change the assessments affecting bank stock, and to not accept any tender that might be made of less than the entire amount of tax levied thereon. After levy of the tax, the same shareholder tendered to the county treasurer 60 per cent. of the amount of the tax on his shares in full payment, which was refused. The tender has not been kept good by deposit but in the bill the bank offers to pay such portion of the taxes levied as this court may adjudge legal and collectible from the bank.

The laws of this state in force at the time of said assessment made all banks therein agents for their respective shareholders, and authorized the collection from each bank of taxes upon its stock assessed against it as such agent. 1 Hill's Code, §§ 1038-1040. Compliance with the provisions of this statute is prerequisite to enforcement of obligations and the exercise of rights created thereby. The complainant is not charged upon the assessment roll as agent for its shareholders, nor charged at all for any tax upon its stock, nor even referred to by its proper corporate name in the assessments against its several shareholders; therefore the warrant to the tax collector confers no authority upon him to seize the property of the bank to pay said taxes, and charge the same against the shareholders.

Unjust discrimination in the valuation of national bank stock, as compared with the assessment of other moneyed capital in the hands of individual citizens of the state, is prohibited. Rev. St. U.S. Sec. 5219. Shareholders of national bank stock have this statute as a guaranty that they cannot be taxed upon their stock heavier than other moneyed capital in the state; and, when appealed to in their behalf, the courts are bound...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Gully v. First Nat. Bank In Meridian
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1938
    ... ... assessment should be made in the bank's name in order to ... hold it liable for the tax as agent for its shareholders ... under the statute ... 61 C ... J. 709, sec. 875; First National Bank of Walla Walla v ... Hungate, 62 F. 548; Paul v. McGraw, 28 P. 532; ... State v. Security National Bank, 173 N.W. 885; ... First National Bank v. Anderson, 192 N.W. 6, 269 ... U.S. 341, 70 L.Ed. 295; Western Improvement Banking Co ... v. Murry, 56 P. 798; Albuquerque v. Perea, 25 ... P. 776, 147 U.S. 47, 38 ... ...
  • Railroad & Telephone Companies v. Board of Equalizers of Tennessee
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • December 23, 1897
    ...46, 23 P. 409; Railway Co. v. Guenther, 19 F. 395; Investment Co. v. Charlton, 32 F. 192; Benn v. Chehalis Co. (Wash.) 39 P. 365; Bank v. Hungate, 62 F. 548, Chicago & A.R. Co. v. Livingstone Co., 68 Ill. Marsh v. Supervisors, 2 Wis. 502; Philleo v. Hiles, Id. 527; Investment Co. v. Parrish......
  • First National Bank of Nephi v. Christensen
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1911
    ... ... relief. (1 Cooley on Taxation [3d Ed.], page 712; and see ... note one, page 714 and cases cited; First National Bank ... v. Hungate, 62 F. 548; First National Bank v ... Treasurer Lucas Co., 25 F. 749; Puget Sound National ... Bank v. King County, 57 F. 433.) ... All ... is made, are entitled to the protection of this ... constitutional provision. (First Nat. Bank v ... Lindsay, 45 F. 619.) ... When ... the taxing officers of a county by tacit understanding assess ... all personal property ... ...
  • Puget Sound Nat. Bank v. King County
    • United States
    • United States Circuit Court, District of Washington, Northern Division
    • June 18, 1894

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT